The correct answer is d, public goods.
The definition of a public good is a good or service that is nonrivalrous and nonexclusive. This means that individuals cannot be excluded from the use of the good or it can be enjoyed without paying for it, and use by one individual does not prevent others from using it.
Answer:
Income elasticity of demand = - 0.56
Explanation:
Given,
P=10, Pc=100, Pd=2, A=5, and I=50.
So,
Q=200-5(10)-.1(100)-.5(2)+.2(5)-(50).
Q=90 (level of income)
Computation:
Given , I = 50, Q = 90.
ΔQ / ΔI = -1
Income elasticity of demand = (ΔQ / ΔI) x (I / Q)
Income elasticity of demand = - 1 x (50 / 90)
Income elasticity of demand = - 0.56
Answer:
Design Capacity Utilization= 75%
Production efficiency = 120%
Explanation:
Okay, so the question is to determine both the design and the effective capacity utilization measures and make a conclusion from there
1. The Capacity Utilization = The Actual Output/ Design Capacity
Actual Output= 300 hamburgers a day
Design Capacity = 400 Hamburgers a day
Therefore Capacity Utilization = 300 hamburgers/400 hamburgers x 100
= 75%
2. The Efficiency of the production = The Actual Output / The Effective Capacity
Actual Output = 300 Hamburgers a day
Effective Capacity = 250 hamburgers
= 300 Hamburgers/ 250 Hamburgers x 100
= 120%
Conclusion
First we see that the actual utilization of capacity is more better than the effective capacity and this is good. Also, the Design Capacity is higher than the actual capacity utilization which should also be expected as design capacity is a calculation based on ideal conditions that may be not realistic in real life conditions.
Answer:
There are no options listed, but what I can tell you for sure is that John's actions were both unethical and illegal.
What John did is unethical because it is not moral and it goes against all the principles that guide professional conduct. John also did something illegal because he was an accomplice in committing fraud against the company. He knowingly benefited from the accountant's illegal actions, and that is basically the legal definition of an accomplice to a crime.
<span>The answer is C. Transportation. In order to get the product to consumers, manufactures have to rely on their transportation to get that product into stores across the region, or countries they are travelling to. If some of the transportation breaks down, like perhaps a truck crash or plane crash that was carrying a manufacturer''s goods, those products would not make it to the store and thus be unavailable to the consumer to buy.</span>