I am guessing you want to round to the tenths, because nothing comes after the hundredths. So it would be 0.9. (But it would stay the same if you are rounding to the hundredths.)
Yea you are right it is right
First, you need to find the zero of x+3, which is -3
then you multiply -3×1, which equals -3
the reason why I multiplied -3×1 is because the 1 is the coefficient of x^2 but we just don't see it because we don't need to.
once we get -3 we add that to the next coefficient (-5)
-3+-5=-8
we take the sum (-8) and multiply that to -3 (the zero of x+3)
we get 24, so we add -22+24=2
-22 Is the next coefficient to come and 2 is our remainder
the new equation is: x-8 remainder 2
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that Home sales has 95% confidence interval to estimate the average loss in home value.
a) If std deviation of losses doubles as 3000 from 1500, we have margin of error also increases. Because margin of error
= ±Critical value * Std error
= ±Critical value * Std dev/sqrt n
Hence we find that whenever std deviation increases the margin of error increases, for the same level of confidence.
b) Whenever confidence level increases, critical value increases and as a result margin of error increases. Hence by reducing from 95% to 90% confidence interval would be reduced. True
c) Instead of changing conf level, increasing sample size would give more reliale and accurate results.
