Answer: Option A
Explanation: In simple words post decision resonance refers to the feeling of regret that one gets after making decision that the choice they made was not correct.
This theory suggests that the level of regret that one feels depends on two factors, the net desirability between the option chooses and option not chooses, the importance of the decision made in the Decision makers life.
In the given case, Kimberly bought a camera and now think she did not make right choice. Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is A.
Answer:
because they are fun and if you get distracted you don't want to finish what you are doing
Answer:
His regular earnings ( based on regular rates) is $480 while his total earnings for the week ended March 15 is $738.
Explanation:
Regular rate = $12 per hour
Rate for hours in excess of 40 hours per week
= (3/2) × $12
= $18
Rate for hours for Sunday is double
= 2 × $12
= $24
During the week ended March 15, 9 hours each day from Monday through Friday, 6 hours on Saturday, and 4 hours on Sunday
Period in excess of 40 hours during the week
= (9 × 5) + 4 - 40
= 9
Total regular earning = 40 × $12
= $480
Additional earnings = (9 × $18) + (4 × $24)
= $162 + $96
= $258
Total earnings = $480 + $258
= $738
Answer:
Monetary Contribution
Explanation:
Parent-child relationship refers to the way the parents nurture the social, physiological, and psychological development of the children.
Monetary contribution implied that in order for parents to give love and care to the children, the children need to provide the parents with a certain amount of money in return.
The type of care and attention that parents give to their children tend to be voluntary. It's purely based on unconditional love and affection. This is why we don't consider monetary contribution as a factor that influence parent-child relationship.
Pierre engaging in such actions is known as rationalizing.
When a person rationalizes a decision they:
- <em>T</em><em>ry to prove that what they did isn't bad </em>
- <em>C</em><em>ome up with some sort of reasoning to support their decision </em>
Pierre is clearly doing something wrong here by increasing expenses more than they are supposed to be. He however convinces himself that what he is doing is not bad because no one will notice.
He is therefore coming up with reasons to prove that what he is doing is not bad and we can conclude based on this fact that he is engaged in rationalizing his behavior.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/14453354.</em>
