Biden would offer superior leadership.
Biden has spent almost his entire adult life in elective office, and in his Senate career acquired a reputation as a dealmaker and foreign policy expert. He is a supporter of common-sense gun control and environmental protections. He listens to the advice of scientists on matters of public health. As vice president under Barack Obama, he managed the 2009 economic recovery package — an experience that, sadly, will be relevant in 2021. His victory in the Democratic primaries was built on support from Black voters, demonstrating an ability to build coalitions across racial lines that will be of critical importance in a starkly divided nation that must address the sins of its past. Biden has already made history by choosing as his running mate Senator Kamala Harris, a fierce defender of civil rights and LGBTQ rights and the nation’s first Black and Asian-American woman to be a major party’s vice presidential nominee. Biden has the chance to be a transformative president, expanding health care access, preventing climate catastrophe and cleaning up our air and water, and protecting voting rights. But Joe Biden doesn’t need Congress at all for the most important job before him: to make the presidency great again.
Answer:
Explanation:
The 1,2,and 8th amendment contribute to criminal law in the sense that. The first amendment is “right of speech,religion, and press” therefor a case in criminal court would give the defendant legal protection through freedom of press and speech. The second amendment is “the right to bear arm” persons bearing arms legally, if and when used as a self defense weapon in a court case may be spared harsh punishment and none if any is given. And finally the eight amendment is “excessive bail, excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishment.” If a defendant is guilty of committing a crime he/she may be given bail depending on the charges. This amendments limits bail for a guilty defendant so that he/she may not commit the crime more than once and may not have freedom.
Relevance, materiality, and competence.
Also if you could do Brainiest answer that would be great, trying to rank up. :)
Answer:
The Supreme Court of the United States.
Explanation:
Pursuant to the US Constitution, the Supreme Court has both original and appellate jurisdiction. Original jurisdiction implies that the Supreme Court is the first and only court entitled to hear a case. However, the Constitution limits this power and the court deals with cases involving disputes between states or controversies among ambassadors or other ministers. Appellate jurisdiction refers to the fact that the court has the authority to review judgments passed by lower courts. Frequently, the Supreme Court hears the cases that have already been decided by any US Court of Appeals.
If a person is not satisfied with a decision/ruling made by a district court, he/she may appeal such decision. The case is then reviewed by a Court of Appeals. After the appellate court has pronounced judgment, the ruling may be reviewed by the Supreme Court.
Answer:
participatory democracy and deliberative democracy.
Explanation:
Two leading forms of direct democracy are participatory democracy and deliberative democracy. Semi-direct democracies, in which representatives administer day-to-day governance, but the citizens remain the sovereign, allow for three forms of popular action: referendum (plebiscite), initiative, and recall.
I hope it's helpful
