Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
Individuals and higher education levels
Explanation:
they are more likely to be inform about issues and more willing to invest the time and energy in joining an interest group that represents their views. They also are more likely to understand how important and you are in shaping public policy.
The answer letter d I just know
Answer:
Explain factors taken into consideration to determine the similarity of a name for it to be called “undesirable” under section 24 of the Companies Act (Chapter 24:03
Answer:
The Electoral College is problematic because it underrepresented the votes of racial minorities, maybe??
