All categories

3 years ago

What is additive notation

Mathematics

2 answers:

Damm [24]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Additive notation is a convention often used for representing a commutative binary operation of an algebraic structure. The symbol used for the operation is +.

* Hopefully this helps:) Mark me the brainliest:)!!

sdas [7]3 years ago

7 0

It is a convention used often for representing a commutative binary operation. X+Y is used to indicate the result of the operation

You might be interested in

On a coordinate plane, a curved line with a minimum value of (negative 1.25, negative 3.25) and a maximum value of (0.25, negati

Juliette [100K]

The correct option is:

As the x-values go to positive infinity, the function's values go to positive infinity.

<h3>What is the end behavior of the function?</h3>

By the description, We know that the function has the points:

(-1.25, -3.25), (0.25, -1.75) (-2.25, 0), (0, -2), (-2.75, 6), (1.5, 6)

Notice that from x = 0.25 to x = 1.5 the function goes upwards, then in the right side, the function goes up, so as x goes to positive infinity, also does f(x).

On the left side, we can see that from x = -2.75 to x = -2.25 the function goes downwards.

So, as x goes to the left (negative infinity) f(x) goes upwards.

Then as x tends to negative infinity, f(x) tends to infinity.

The correct option is:

As the x-values go to positive infinity, the function's values go to positive infinity.

If you want to learn more about end behavior:

brainly.com/question/1365136

#SPJ1

8 0

2 years ago

Alejandro uses the steps below to convert

dezoksy [38]

Answer:

The division was computed incorrectly.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Workings:

$\frac{5}{8}$ to percentage

$\frac{8}{5} = 1.6 = 160\%$

Required

Explain his error

The question says 5/8

Instead, Alejandro's working shows 8/5.

This working is done in an incorrect order and the correct solution is:

Let

$x = \frac{5}{8}$

Solve the fraction

$x = 0.625$

Multiply by 100%

$x = 0.625 * 100\%$

$x = 62.5\%$

<em>Hence, option (a) is correct.</em>

7 0

2 years ago

What is the measure of x?

Sveta_85 [38]

Answer:

Hello!

After reviewing the problem you have provided I have come up with the correct solution:

x= 9

Step-by-step explanation:

To come up with this solution you have to first realize that the smaller triangle is a proportionally scaled down version of the entire larger triangle! (I will show what I mean in a linked picture)

So after we have realized that the smaller triangle is a scaled down version of the larger one, we can then create a formula or ratio to calculate the value of the missing side of the larger triangle (being x+6=??).

To create the formula/ratio I divided 10inches by 4inches. Thus the larger triangle is 2.5 times larger than the smaller one.

I then use this ratio to figure out the missing length of the larger triangle by doing:

6inches x 2.5 = 15inches.

I then inputed the 15inches into the formula of the missing side:

x+6=15

Subtracted 6 from both sides to simplify, and came up with the solution!

x=9

Let me know if this helps!

4 0

2 years ago

This legend about Admiral Nelson, like other

il63 [147K]

Correct option is E, like legends about other naval heroes, is

It does this by contrasting "this legend" with "legends about other naval heroes," so avoiding the mistake of the original. There is an unreasonable comparison in option (A). "This legend" is contrasted with "other naval heroes."

There is an agreement mistake in option (B). For the single subject "this legend," the plural verb "are" is used. There is an unreasonable comparison in option (C). "This legend" is contrasted with "other naval heroes." Choice (D) has an agreement mistake.

For the single subject "this legend," the plural verb "are" is used. Option E can be used to rewrite the sentence's highlighted portion. By contrasting "this legend" with "legends about other naval heroes," the inaccuracy is fixed. As a result, choice E is the right answer.

Here's a question with an answer similar to this Admiral Nelson:

brainly.com/question/17671489

#SPJ4

6 0

1 year ago

You use a line of best fit for a set of data to make a prediction about an unknown value. the correlation coeffecient is -0.833

alina1380 [7]

Answer: The square root of π has attracted attention for almost as long as π itself. When you’re an ancient Greek mathematician studying circles and squares and playing with straightedges and compasses, it’s natural to try to find a circle and a square that have the same area. If you start with the circle and try to find the square, that’s called squaring the circle. If your circle has radius r=1, then its area is πr2 = π, so a square with side-length s has the same area as your circle if s2 = π, that is, if s = sqrt(π). It’s well-known that squaring the circle is impossible in the sense that, if you use the classic Greek tools in the classic Greek manner, you can’t construct a square whose side-length is sqrt(π) (even though you can approximate it as closely as you like); see David Richeson’s new book listed in the References for lots more details about this. But what’s less well-known is that there are (at least!) two other places in mathematics where the square root of π crops up: an infinite product that on its surface makes no sense, and a calculus problem that you can use a surface to solve.

Step-by-step explanation: this is the same paragraph The square root of π has attracted attention for almost as long as π itself. When you’re an ancient Greek mathematician studying circles and squares and playing with straightedges and compasses, it’s natural to try to find a circle and a square that have the same area. If you start with the circle and try to find the square, that’s called squaring the circle. If your circle has radius r=1, then its area is πr2 = π, so a square with side-length s has the same area as your circle if s2 = π, that is, if s = sqrt(π). It’s well-known that squaring the circle is impossible in the sense that, if you use the classic Greek tools in the classic Greek manner, you can’t construct a square whose side-length is sqrt(π) (even though you can approximate it as closely as you like); see David Richeson’s new book listed in the References for lots more details about this. But what’s less well-known is that there are (at least!) two other places in mathematics where the square root of π crops up: an infinite product that on its surface makes no sense, and a calculus problem that you can use a surface to solve.

5 0

3 years ago

What is additive notation​

What is additive notation