In Act III, Scene 3, Hamlet has an opportunity to kill Claudius, but he doesn't act because he doesn't want to risk sending Claudius to heaven by killing him in prayer. Hamlet doesn't want to break the decorum. He wants to surprise a villain in some vile deed and kill him at that. "<span>He took my father grossly, full of bread,
</span><span>With all his crimes broad blown, as flush as May." If Claudius didn't care about his brother's immortal soul, Hamlet should now pay extra attention to Claudius' soul and do his best to send it to hell. </span>The very thought of the risk stops his sword.
Hamlet's inaction in Scene 3 is not just a result of plain superstition. Hamlet doesn't just want to kill and annihilate Claudius; he symbolically and unequivocally condemns his uncle's soul to hell. However, one scene later, he kills Polonius, mistaking him for Claudius. All his restraints are now off, and he is free to kill the person hiding behind the curtain.
This plot choice clearly shows that Hamlet always acts like an intellectual, even when he is hurt and offended. He has to rationalize both his inaction and his action. More precisely, thinking always precedes (and motivates) his actions and inactions. Irony has it that his action is misdirected, once it happens.
By the way, the R.A.C.E. analytical method contains Restatement, Answer, Citation, and Explanation. I think I've covered all the elements here.
Answer:
A as c doesn't make sense and b has to have a sentence before it to make sense, therefore d is also incorrect.
yoyyoyorniogbebgjrsojbgvosjExplanation:
The guy was suffering in life but he still had love and care for his
sister to say happy birthday. It shows how mental health is not affected
by how you live your life. It's not affected by a lavish life but
rather its what your mind thinks is what your mental health leads to.
YOU'RE SO WELCOME
I LOVE YOU
<3
IM CREEPY
BUT IM SMART
HEHEHEHEH
