The argument of Reagan is most likely found in the following sentence:
<span>the Soviets challenged the Western alliance with a grave new threat, (this statement sounds most like an argument and least like a fact).
He supports this argument by mentioning things such as </span>
<span>SS-20 nuclear missiles - so we see that he supports the claim with a fact. However, he also mentions personal impressions, such as during his visits.
Therefore, the best answer is the following:
</span>
<span>C) Reagan’s evidence is relevant but is insufficient to prove his claims as it relies on his own personal beliefs.</span>
That the people are trying to be different
Answer: Sentences 3 and 5.
Explanation:
<em>"Dr. Heidegger's Experiment</em>" is a short story written by Nathaniel Hawthorne, centered around a doctor who is convinced that he received a particular kind of water from the Fountain of Youth.
In this excerpt, Dr. Heidegger and four people have lost their youth. They drank water which made them young only for a short period of time. Although four people are sad over their lost youth, Dr. Heidegger is aware now that they should be careful what they wish for, as they just might get it. In Sentence 3, a woman wishes to die because she cannot look at her skinny and wrinkled hands. She cannot stand the fact that she is old.
In Sentence 5, however, it is seen that Dr. Heidegger takes a different perspective on this issue: he believes that they should have never got their youth at all.
These two sentences reflect the central theme of the passage, but explore it from a different perspective.
Ways u could relate it would be since we’re highschoolers our generation IS the future and we have the power to change the world. starting conservation now would reap benefits in the future