Answer:
P = 49°
R = 131°
Q = 114°
S = 66°
Step-by-step explanation:
in a quadrilateral inscribed in a circle, the opposite angles are always supplementary, meaning they add up to 150
we are given opposite angles P and R (S is not given so we can't use Q and S)
P+R = 180
5y+14 + 15y + 26 = 180
20y + 40 = 180
20y = 140
y = 7
so...
P = 5(7) + 14 = 35 + 14 = 49
R = 180-49 (since opposite angles in inscribed quadrilaterals are supplementary) = 131
Q = (7)^2 + 65 = 49 + 65 = 114
S = 180-114 = 66
Answer:
1) Mercedes Benz A class which is $ 33495 (starting),
made in Germany
https://www. truecar .com/prices-new/mercedes - benz/
It has depreciation 6% in the first three years https:// www .themoneycalculator .com/vehicle-finance/calculators/car-depreciation-by-make-and-model/MERCEDES-BENZ/A_CLASS/
2) Ferrari 458 $35,563
https:// www. ferrari. com/en-EN/auto/458-speciale
Ferrari 458 models depreciate 29% in the first three years
https://www. themoneycalculator .com/vehicle-finance/calculators/car-depreciation-by-make-and-model/FERRARI/458/
3)Honda Civic $20,950
https:// automobiles .honda .com/civic
depreciation is 34%
https:// www. themoneycalculator .com /vehicle-finance/calculators/car-depreciation-by-make-and-model/HONDA/CIVIC/
Answer:
B I think
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Exponential function representing final amount with compound interest compounded continuously,

Here, A = Final amount
P = principal amount
r = Rate of interest
t = Duration of investment
For P = $9600
r = 6%
A = 2 × 9600 = $19200
By substituting these values in the formula,



ln(2) = 0.06t
t = 
t = 11.55245
t ≈ 11.5525 years
Any amount will get doubled (with the same rate of interest and duration of investment) in the same time.
Therefore, $960000 will get doubled in 11.5525 years.
Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.
What is unmeasured cofounding?
- By definition, an unmeasured confounder is a variable that is connected to both the exposed and the result and could explain the apparent observed link.
- The validity of interpretation in observational studies is threatened by unmeasured confounding. The use of negative control group to reduce unmeasured confounding has grown in acceptance and popularity in recent years.
Although they've been utilised mostly for bias detection, negative controls have a long history in laboratory sciences and epidemiology of ruling out non-causal causes. A pair of negative control exposure and outcome variables can be utilised to non-parametrically determine the average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data that is vulnerable to uncontrolled confounding, according to a recent study by Miao and colleagues.
Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.
Learn more about unmeasured confounding here:
brainly.com/question/10863424
#SPJ4