Answer:
To be honest just think there´s no right or wrong answer (Hope i helped you Alot)´
Explanation:
Well, this question cannot really be answered generally. It's a matter of judgement, and it's best judged for particular cases. The consideration of this depends on two factors:
what are the probable costs (in terms of human life, and the quality of human life) of the invasion? - it's important not to diminish these factors, as the assessments of casualties often tend to be lower than the actual numbers
how high is the risk of the alternative. Do we have a good, unbiased reason to believe that a spread of nuclear weapons (unchecked spread, or spread that gives reasons to worry. US has a lot of nuclear weapons, but since it's not planning to use them on other country, it wouldn't be justified to attach the US) will happen? what kind of conflict are we risking?
in any case, this is not an easy question, and perhaps there will never be a good answer for it.
I believe the answer is: <span>I have had very little trouble adjusting to their departure.
If the couples experiencing separation with their children in the middle age (in mid 40s) , it could actually benefit them emotionally.
During the time their children are gone, they have more time to do things such that is not possible when they're taking care of their children (such as pursuing a hobby or going on long vacations)</span>
Identity foreclosure is wrong
Correct Answer is Identity Moratorium
A recent meta-analysis of 124 studies in 2010 by Jane Kroger and her colleagues showed that during
adolescence and emerging adulthood, identity moratorium status rose consistently to age 19 and thereafter declined. On the other hand, identity achievement
rose across late adolescence and emerging adulthood, while foreclosure and
diffusion statuses were shown to have declined across the high school years but
fluctuated in the late teens and emerging adulthood.
