According to Cynthia Scott and Dennis Jaffe's stages of coping with change in an organization, at the first stage of the cycle, individuals' interests are not threatened.
The Scott and Jaffe Change Model, otherwise called the Scott and Jaffe Resistance Cycle, was created by Cynthia Scott and Dennis Jaffe, and was first presented in their article, "Make due and Thrive in Times of Change".
In the event that you've at any point been liable for overseeing change inside an association, you might have experienced protection from change.
The Scott and Jaffe Change Model doesn't make a difference in all hierarchical change. Clearly, assuming a representative's underlying reaction to a proposed change is that it's perfect and they can truly see the advantage, for both themselves and the association, then they will quickly be in stage 4 of the model. In this situation, there will be no protection from the change.
No change model will be totally exact, as a matter of fact. Notwithstanding, each model can give us understanding and rules which can more readily prepare us to really oversee change.
Learn more about Cynthia Scott and Dennis Jaffe here :
brainly.com/question/28232320
#SPJ4
The answer isn't false, in fact its true.
D, all of the above. The scientific method goes through the process of making a hypothesis, testing it, and reviewing the results. It goes through a full lab report.
