Thank you for posting your question here. It can be considered to be consistent with the given facts. As you know, an hypothesis, much less a theory, is never proven. It can be shown to be consistent with given observations. As new observations are collected, the given hypothesis may have to be modified.
If the celery became crisp when it was soaked in ice water, then clearly that the water has rehydrated the celery is a reasonable hypothesis. But did it have to be ice cold water? Would room temperature water work? What about boiling water?
And thus most of the time, the success of an hypothesis leads to the design of new experiments to test and expand the original hypothesis.
<span>I believe the answer is: Stolen Valor had a punishment if a person lie, but in false speech the person is protected by the first amendment the freedom of speech
The 'lies' that covered by stolen valor are the ones that being done to illegally obtain money, properties or other forms of tangible benefits from other people. False speech on the other hand, tend to be political or ideological in nature and being done as a form of </span>persuasion.
One of the things that is true of thick-client applications is with a thick-client application, a system administrator must install the new version on each user computer
hope this helps
