Answer: Eric's dad is using <u>authoritative parenting style.</u>
Explanation:
Parents who opt for authoritative parenting style have high standards, but also take child's emotional needs into consideration. Those parents define clear boundaries of what is acceptable and what is not, but maintain a healthy relationship with their children. Most importantly, they do not just expect blind obedience from their children, but explain the reasons behind their decisions. In this case, Eric's dad interrupts Eric in his game, but reasons with his son and explains why he is not allowed to continue playing.
Answer: Over-sized ego
Explanation:
Over-sized ego is defined as the property of having big ego in which a person tends to lose interpersonal skills and empathy.They believe their every thought and work is correct and do not base their opinions and views according to other people.They have the tendency to be right in everything as thinking of being superior than others .
According to the question, Tyrone is not able to communicate due to obstruction created by over-sized ego.He thinks of being superior after being promoted to manager position.This makes him ignore other opinion and instruction of boss.He thinks he is taking correct measure for handling project and others view and support are not important.
The correct answer is letter D
Explanation: Sigmund Freud has created the Psychoanalysis, that is a theory of personality and system of therapy for treating mental disorders.
In Psychoanalysis the patient can talks in a free way about how they feel and their thoughts, is called free association.
Psychoanalysis was very expensive, and only rich people could do the therapy.
I believe that the answer to the question asked above is that the <span>Baudelaires had escaped the marriage that would turn the wealth their family have to their wicked step father. Also all the wrong doings of the man was revealed. </span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
In Schenck v. the United States (1919), the Supreme Court ruled that criticism of the draft was NOT protected by the First Amendment, because it created a clear and present danger to American interests.
- In the Schenk v. US case, which concerns the freedom of speech issue, Schenk urged Americans to forgo the World War I draft.
- The Supreme Court concluded in Schenck v. the United States that the First Amendment did not apply to criticism of the draft because it posed a clear and present danger to American interests.
- The U.S. Supreme Court heard a First Amendment challenge to federal legislation on free speech grounds for the first time in this case.
Learn about more Supreme Court here
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
