That would be the Gobi desert.
B is the answer because......
Answer:
Insurance companies should have the ability to legally learn the genetic profiles of people that wish to be insured.
Explanation: The reasoning...
Insurance wise the more of a liability you are the more insurance companies might not want to provide insurance to you, and if in their own studies they should be permitted to find about any history of genetic illness, this followed by higher risks of cancer, and diabetes might make you a high-risk client. Insurance is something that is sold so that the possibilities can be dealt with. If a person has a higher risk of one of those medical possibilities that might cost the insurance company more than you pay the monthly cost. This is unsavoury for companies that work like this hence it should be in their right to allow for genetic profile background checks, funded by themselves of course.
Answer:
The answer is the Geography Hypothesis.
Explanation:
The geography hypothesis holds that the differences in prosperity that are found around the world are due in large part to forces of nature, like the differences in geography, climate, and ecology that are evident in different regions of the world. The geography hypothesis emphasizes how the natural environment can explain why some nations are more prosperous than others. In contrast, the institutions hypothesis emphasizes the influences that are made and caused by humans. Human poverty is largely man-made in the institutions view.
