1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kipish [7]
3 years ago
11

What was another issue upon which the North and South disagreed that intensified sectional feeling?

History
2 answers:
maxonik [38]3 years ago
5 0

Tariffs were another issue upon which the North and South disagreed that intensified sectional feeling.

Answer: Option C

<u>Explanation: </u>

The sectionalism was based on the fact of slavery, where northerners wanted to abolish slavery but southerners did not as they were dependent upon cash crop which was labour intensive. The other issue which raised to heights were the tariff.

North America supported the tariff based on the fact that the tariff would let them establish competition with the Britain. But the southerners were not in support as they were at drawback due to the import of goods priced much more.  Hence, North America and South America divided themselves based on the sectional diversion which was intensified.

pshichka [43]3 years ago
4 0
I want the same answer
You might be interested in
I need help with 3,5,6,and 7 could someone help please??
natulia [17]
3. United Nations was formed promote world peace
5. Is the Berlin Wall
6. To transport materials to East Berlin
7. B
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This was the outcome of what revolution?
Karolina [17]
It's number one the French Revolution
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
On what grounds did the Republican party attack the New Deal during the election of 1936?
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Unemployment had gone down, millions were working in New Deal programs ... The 1936 election was a referendum on President Roosevelt's first-term policies. ... And I don't think the Republican Party is really wide awake to that.” ... of anti-Semitism and Ku Klux Klan activities in Kansas for its attacks on black Americans.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What motives caused the crusades
Anuta_ua [19.1K]

Answer:

to fight for God and to protect respond muslim aggression

Explanation:

answer is in answer

3 0
2 years ago
In what was the invasion of South Asia different from gazbavids
Pavel [41]

Explanation:

Invasions from Ghazni

        The first inroad into the heart of the area which is now Afghanistan was made by Yaqub ibn Lais, the Saffarid, who captured Kabul in 870 and founded Ghazni at about the same time. Kabul was, however, lost by his successor to Hindu rulers known as the Hindu Shahis, whose capital was at Waihind (Ohind), near modern Peshawar, and whose rule extended to Kabul in the west and the Bias River in the east.

        In the meanlime the Samanids (874-999) had established themselves [[23]] at Bukhara and gradually brought the greater part of the territory to the east of Baghdad under their sway. Persian in origin, they favored the Persian language. Rudaki, the Chaucer of Persian poetry, flourished at the Samanid court, and Persian replaced Arabic as the official language.

        Under the Samanids Turkish slaves gained political and military importance. One of these, Alptigin, rebelled against his Samanid masters and established himself at Ghazni in 962. In 977, Subuktigin, a Turkish slave upon whom Alptigin had bestowed the hand of his daughter, ascended the throne of Ghazni and proceeded to expand his kingdom by annexing adjacent areas in Khurasan, Seistan, and Lamghan. Alarmed at the rising power of the new Turkish principality, Jaipal, Shahi raja of Waihind, took the offensive and advanced toward Subuktigin's capital. The two armies met between Lamghan (modem Jalalabad) and Ghazni. Jaipal was defeated, and was forced to agree to pay a large indemnity to the Turkish ruler. He defaulted and tried to avenge his loss, but he was again decisively defeated, and Subuktigin followed up his success by forcing Jaipal to cede the territory between Lamghan and Peshawar .

        Later Muslim historians often represent Subuktigin as a champion of the faith, whose "chief occupation was the propagation of Islam with fire and sword among the idolators of India," but, in fact, he never crossed the Indus, and the only two expeditions in which he took the initiative "were undertaken rather as measures of reprisal and for the purpose of securing his dominion than with any intention of propagating his faith."/1/ Subuktigin, however, paved the way for the more active efforts of his son Mahmud by occupying the key city of Peshawar and building roads leading to the Indian frontiers along which his son marched during his numerous expeditions.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Egypt nationalized the Suez Canal during the Suez Crisis. What does this mean? The Egyptian government took control of the canal
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not something usually asked when considering a source?
    14·2 answers
  • How did American imperial actions compare to those of Great Britain and other European nations?
    9·1 answer
  • Why were railroads so important for the
    12·1 answer
  • It can be inferred that the consumer economy was built on the backs of
    10·2 answers
  • In the electoral college, what formula was utilized to set the number of electors?
    15·1 answer
  • What were Thomas Paine's views on monarchy and heredity succession?
    11·1 answer
  • From what country did most<br> immigrants arrive on the West<br> Coast during the 1800's?
    13·1 answer
  • Plz help me pleaseeeee
    6·1 answer
  • What was one effect of the "run on the banks" in the early 1930s?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!