Answer:
Correct options
A.) the $4 in direct costs she would spend to drive to and from her babysitting job:
Emily will have to spend $2 to and $2 on gas for the babysitting job. She will have to consider if she can bear the additional cost compared to the other job opportunity.
B.) the opportunity costs of not working at the store on a Saturday when she babysits:
When Emily is babysitting she has to consider the opportunity cost of working at the retail store. The fact the she will not have to drive to work, instead working at a place close to her home.
Incorrect option
C.) the cost of clothes and personal items (e.g., phone) Emily uses during babysitting:
On both jobs Emily will incur cost of clothing and other personal items, so this is not a cost she should be considering in making a decision between the two jobs.
<span>According to the Affordable Care Act new health insurance marketplaces are established by the Patient Protection Act. This Act was put in place to let patients compare different health insurance companies and benefits to determine what is best for them. The benefits are dependent on how many people or an individual needs coverage and what type of coverage they are wanting to have. </span>
Answer:
A
Explanation:
When we talk about franchising then it comes with high cost and fee. Firstly, the franchisee need to fulfill certain requirements like specified space, Dining capacity etc. Then franchisee needs pay franchise fee. So to fulfil the specific requirements to attain the franchise, the cost is high. Franchisor, to maintain the brand name apply certain specific requirements on number of diners, space, type of dishes etc. They all comes with high cost. Also the franchise fee will be high as written in question that its successful fast food chain.
After business starts, the franchisee needs to pay certain amount to franchisor every month in terms of ROYALITY.
So, WHen we talk about franchise it comes with high cost.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": certification of false financial statements.
Explanation:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) is a statute that aims to increase corporate governance and enhance internal control of companies. SOX's primary purpose is to protect stakeholders from false corporate financial statement representations. Investors must know that the financial information on which they rely is accurate and that their accuracy has been checked by an independent third party.
<em>Altering, destroying, covering-up or falsifying information in the financial statements of a firm is considered a crime since the SOX implementation with a maximum sentence of 20 years.</em>
Answer:
5.47%
Explanation:
The computation of yield to maturity is shown in the attachment:
Given that
FV = $1000
PV = ($980)
PMT = 5% ÷ 2 × 1,000 = $25
Number of years = 5 years × 2 = 10 Years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after applying the above formula, the yield to maturity is
= 2.73 × 2
= 5.46%
Therefore with the help of spreadsheets (as attached), we could explain in a better manner.
