False is the correct answer
Answer:
e. None of the above assumptions would invalidate the model
Explanation:
Incomplete question <em>"The constant growth model is given below: P0 = [D0(1 + g)]/[(rs - g)]"</em>
<em />
According to dividend discount model,
P0 = D1/(R-G)
D1 - Dividend at t =1
R - Required rate
G - Growth rate
This would be invalid if R < G. In other words, Dividend growth model will be invalid in only one situation, that is, when growth rate is more than require return. In this situation growth model cannot be used.
Philanthropic corporate social responsibility (CSR) serves as philanthropic approach to CSR in which organizations target programs that will generate the most positive publicity.
<h3>What is Philanthropic corporate social responsibility?</h3>
Philanthropic corporate social responsibility can be regarded as one whereby, there us donation funds, goods to another organization or cause.
They runs the greatest risk of being perceived as self-serving behavior.
Learn more about Philanthropic corporate social responsibility at:
brainly.com/question/13171394
Answer:
B;A
Explanation:
You have the following data on three stocks: Stock Standard Deviation Beta A 20% 1.59 B 30% 1.71 C 25% 1.29 If you are a strict risk minimizer, you would choose Stock B if it is to be held in isolation and Stock A if it is to be held as part of a well-diversified portfolio.
Answer:
affect nominal but not real variables. This view that money is ultimately neutral is consistent with classical theory.
Explanation:
This idea is held by classical economists (not by most economists) since they believe in the quantitative theory of money:
MV = PQ
- M = quantity of money
- V = velocity of money
- P = price level
- Q = quantity of goods
Classical theory was abandoned 90 years ago (according to classical theory, recessions were not possible and couldn't exist, but then the Great Depression came and the impossible became true). Neo-classical or monetarists appeared in the 1960s, and lately, neo-neo-classical appeared with George W. Bush. The problem with the quantitative theory is that it needs the following things to be true in order to hold, and empirical evidence over the last 90 years showed that none of them are true:
- the velocity of money has to be constant (AND IT IS NOT CONSTANT)
- real output is independent on money supply (NOT TRUE)
- causation goes from money to prices (MODERN ECONOMISTS BELIEVE IT IS THE OTHER WAY)
