Who does Gandhi make clear their fight is against, in the final paragraph of his speech, "Quit India"?

History

2 answers:

oksano4ka [1.4K]2 years ago

7 0

their fight was against Britain

lubasha [3.4K]2 years ago

6 0

The final mass movement known as Quit India Movement was launched by Gandhi in 1942. The failure of the Cripps Mission and the arrival of the Japanese army on Indian borders prepared the ground for the Quit Indian Movement. On 8 August 1942 the congress passed the famous Quit India resolution demanding the British to leave India. Gandhi asked the people to imprint in their hearts the mantra 'Do or Die'. He said, "we will either make our country free or die in the attempt we will not live to see the perpetuation of our slavery". Unfortunately Gandhi could not lead the last and final movement as he was arrested on 9th August 1942. But his mantra of 'Do or Die' acted like a magic and there was large scale participation of the people in the movement. The movement finally sounded the death knell of the British empire in India.

You might be interested in

Are video games good? i think they are write 3 sentence of why they are

Zina [86]

Answer:

they are

Explanation:

Video games are good. It teaches people how to work in teams and how to work for what they want/need. Video games are also a good source of entertainment.

6 0

2 years ago

If the core is so hot that the iron and nickel should be melted, what makes the inner core solid?

Anna11 [10]

The inner core is further away from the magma and it gets cooler as it gets closer to earths surface

5 0

3 years ago

Answers? <br> 16. What was the Anaconda Plan

Kobotan [32]

Answer:

Anaconda plan, military strategy proposed by Union General Winfield Scott early in the American Civil War. The plan called for a naval blockade of the Confederate littoral, a thrust down the Mississippi, and the strangulation of the South by Union land and naval forces.

Role In: American Civil War Anaconda plan

Date: 1861 - 1865

<u>help me by marking as brainliest....</u>

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Compare the advantages and disadvantages of stateless societies and those with monarchies or other forms of hereditary rule

postnew [5]

In stateless societies there is little concentration of authority, most positions of authority that exist are very limited in their power and such positions are usually not permanently occupied, and social agencies resolve disputes through Predefined rules tend to be small. Stateless societies are very variable in economic organization, and cultural practices. Most of the history of mankind people have lived in stateless societies. However, few Stateless societies exist at present, since most of them have been obliged to integrate with the state-level companies that surround them.

The Monarchy is a form of State (although it is often defined as a form of Government) in which a group integrated into the State, usually a family that represents a dynasty, embodies the national identity of the country and its head, the monarch, He exercises the role of head of state. The political power of the monarch can vary from the purely symbolic (parliamentary monarchy), to integrate in the form of government: with considerable but restricted executive powers (constitutional monarchy), even the completely autocratic (absolute monarchy).

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why was ending all trade with Britain and Ireland in the First Continental Congress a good thing?

yulyashka [42]

Answer: What inference can you draw from why the First Continental Congress cut off trade with Britain and Ireland? Colonial leaders thought a boycott against British trade would be effective. The colonists had realized that they might have to fight British soldiers.

Explanation: Hope it helps :)

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers