Answer:
For the Soviet Union, the intervention proved extraordinarily costly in a number of ways. While the Soviets never released official casualty figures for the war in Afghanistan, U.S. intelligence sources estimated that as many as 15,000 Russian troops died in Afghanistan, and the economic cost to the already struggling Soviet economy ran into billions of dollars. The intervention also strained relations between the Soviet Union and the United States nearly to the breaking point. President Jimmy Carter harshly criticized the Russian action, stalled talks on arms limitations, issued economic sanctions, and even ordered a boycott of the 1980 Olympics held in Moscow.
I HOPE THIS HELPS
Answer:
Answer : The Old lights stressed emotionalism in their preaching ; the New lights did not.
Explanation:
The Old lights refer to the group of people from a split congregation who still believe in the old doctrine while the New lights are the set of people from the same congregation that splits, who embrace the new things or doctrine that were introduced.
The two groups of people can be differentiated by many things , some of them are.
The OLD light-
1 . They are orthodox clergymen that were deeply skeptical of the emotionalism
2. The clergymen condemned the cryings out, fainting and covulsion in revival meetings.
The NEW light-
1. Allow working miracles or speaking with tongues.
2. Allow woman to speak in public and as a preacher.
3. Refused to be silenced no matter the case may be.
Answer:
a war that is unrestricted in terms of the weapons used, the territory or combatants involved, or the objectives pursued, especially one in which the laws of war are disregarded.
Explanation:
Answer:
The biggest changes were in rigging. At first they concentrated on lateen sails, then added a mix of square sails and lateen for deeper penetration into the South Atlantic, with further changes for the much longer route round the Cape. Knowledge of these techniques was protected by forbidding sales of ships to other countries. A third commercial advantage was Portugal's ability to absorb “new Christians” — Jewish merchants and scholars had played a significant role during Muslim rule.
Hope this helps! If so please mark brainliest and rate/heart to help my account if it did!!
"Trickle-down": supply-side economics creates tax cuts for the wealthy.
Supply-side economics suggests tax cuts for the wealthy. Those tax cuts will be used to create new jobs. New jobs will give more money to the middle-class.
This economic policy makes sense in theory and in some cases the tax cuts resulted in more jobs and higher wages. However, mostly it led to a large gap in wealth as the wealthy kept the money instead of reinvesting in jobs and wages. Eventually as the US moved industry overseas, tax cuts for the wealthy meant the expansion of jobs overseas instead of American jobs. Meanwhile the middle-class pay higher taxes to make up for the loss of taxes from the upper class.
