Answer: D. To provide a pension system to support workers during their
retirement.
Explanation:
The Social Security system was founded by the Social Security Act, signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1935 as part of the New Deal. The general idea was to provide federal aid for elderly, unemployed, and disadvantaged people. However, the main purpose was to provide monetary compensations to retirees over sixty-five years according to their previous tax payments.
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
I believe the answer is: <span>There are numerous and variable interpretations of events and their significance.
In examining history, we have to see each events from the perspective of all the individuals and groups that are involved in the story.
If we only make an interpretation based on one individual;s or one group's point of view, the information would most likely catered in a way that make them appear to have positive attitude/characteristics.</span>
Daylight's saving <span>saves energy and provides an additional hour of </span>daylight<span> during the evening. Hope I helped! ;)</span>
Untrustworthy because they turned their back on him.
