I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the second option. <span>The Volstead Act was passed to enforce the unlawfulness of the distribution, sell, and manufacturing of alcohol which was deemed unconstitutional by the 18th Amendment to the United States Constitution. Hope this answers the question.</span>
6. Typically the government because that’s who they represent.
7. Usually begins with a person or business fighting over money about being harmed by the others actions!! Hope this helps
Answer:
"Thus says the Lord".
Explanation:
The books of the Holy Bible, especially those of the Old Testament, are believed by their respective writers to be from God directly. This was shown in their writings with the use of the phrase "<em>Thus says the Lord</em>". Adding this phrase in their writings or recounts of the events, the authors cement the origin of these book as being genuinely told or gotten from God.
Some examples of such verses are-
1. 2 Chronicles 34: 24
- <em>Behold, I will bring evil upon this place and upon its inhabitants, even all the curses that are written in the book which they have read before the king of Judah. </em>
2. Isaiah 7:7
- <em>Thus says the Lord God: It shall not stand, neither shall it come to pass.</em>
3. Exodus 4:22
- <em>And you shall say to Pharaoh, Thus says the Lord, Israel is My son, even My firstborn.</em>
4. Isaiah 56:4
- <em>For thus says the Lord: To the eunuchs who keep My Sabbaths and choose the things which please Me and hold firmly My covenant --</em>
Answer:
A month after the Democratic conference, Senator Carter Glass of Virginia, a. Democratic leader who received 78 votes for the presidential nomination in 1924, reasserted in his speech of April 5 at Asheville that “prohibition is not a party issue.” The speech was of interest both for its comments on the candidacy of Governor Smith of New York and as a disclosure of the reasoning that prevailed in the Democratic conference.
“Prohibition was not passed by the Democrats or by the Republicans,” Senator Glass said, “but by men of both parties and with no regard for party lines. It was a moral issue, So why in heaven's name should the Democrats make the eighteenth amendment a party issue in the next national campaign, as though electing a wet President would affect the prohibition law? If they do they might just as well take the presidency to the Republicans on a silver platter…They might just as well take their party out and dump it on the scrap heap.”If the Democratic party nominated Governor Smith as “an avowed exponent of the movement to repeal or modify the eighteenth amendment” or should it make prohibition an issue by platform declaration, Senator Glass said, the Democratic candidate would be “badly beaten” and the party “irretrievably wrecked.” He explained at the same time that “the presidency means nothing in the fight for modification,” that the President could not change the Constitution, and that his influence with Congress on such an issue “would be negligible,” In view of these facts Senator Glass believed the modification issue had no place in a presidential platform or a presidential campaign.
Explanation:
Here is just some information to get you started. I copied this off the web, so you cannot use it as direct writing, because that would be copy-right.
I promise you this is not a scam, but the rest of the information or the website I got the information from is linked below.
https://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre1927042300
