I’m just gna take the free points here
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
The correct answers are <span>delusion; despite clear contradictory evidence.
Answer 1: A delusion is an erroneous or unfounded belief that a person is convinced of. Delusions are beliefs that are usually fixed and firm in a person's mind. An example of a delusion is strongly believing and being convinced that someone is "out to get you" because of far-fetched scenarios and beliefs you have conjured up in your imagination (you arrived at this belief without any external evidence).
Answer 2: Another aspect of delusions is that they are firmly held despite </span><span>clear contradictory evidence. Let's consider the previous example again: You believe that someone is out to get you and you hold this belief with strong conviction even when there is no evidence supporting it. For instance the person you feel threatened by has not behaved or acted in any way to suggest that they might harm or hurt you.However, despite this, you still believe that he or she is out to get you.
In this way, </span><span>a delusion is an erroneous belief that is fixed and firmly held despite clear contradictory evidence. </span>
Answer:
This Question talks about the book titled To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee published in 1960.
In chapter ten of the book, Jem and Scout went exploring with their air-rifles to see if they could find a rabbit or a squirrel. They noticed a dog showing that something is not right. Then reported to Calpernia who feared the dog is suffering the dog from rabies.
The dog represents the "madness", and Atticus will do anything to protect his family.
Atticus kills the mad dog with a shot between the eyes.
It fits with the symbolic nature of the incident by showing that some actions are EXTREMELY IMPORTANT.
a census is when you get the population of a nation they often occur once every ten years
