Answer:
Una hipótesis científica es una proposición aceptable que ha sido formulada a través de la recolección de información y datos,2 aunque no esté confirmada, sirve para responder de forma alternativa a un problema con base científica.
Explanation:
Well, All I know is that In the south they were mostly plantations, thus the need for slaves. And in the north, it was mostly city, with a few SMALL farms
Answer:
This is an example of <u>deductive</u> reasoning.
Explanation:
There are two types of typical reasoning, deductive and inductive. In this case for Stuart, he likes deductive reasoning due to his affiliation for logical solutions. This increase in cognitive work means he very carefully analyzes and interprets problems thus he 'induces.' He requires an initial statement or something known for him to come to a valid conclusion. Deductive is usally based on theory and inductive on observations.
The answer is "Backward chaining".
Backward chaining is a deduction technique generally utilized as a part of man-made reasoning, computerized hypothesis provers and evidence associates. Backward chaining approach can be portrayed as working again from an objective. It's a standout amongst the most ordinarily utilized strategies for prevailing upon impedance rules and intelligent implication. Backward chaining works in reverse from a rundown of objectives to decide if there is any information to help them.
The divine right of kings states that no monarch rules by any earthly authority but that they were given the right to rule by the will of GOD, hence the term DIVINE right
