It’s super blurry:(,, i would totally help if it wasn’t !!
Answer: The winning of the war in Europe against Germany.
This was the "Europe first" strategy, coupled with simply holding Japan at bay in the Pacific theater of the war until Germany was defeated. With the scale of the war and the resources needed to defeat the powerful Axis powers, there was a challenge to allocate military personnel and hardware. The strategy was to win the war in Europe first, and then go after Japan.
For Lincoln, allowing American democracy to succeed was compatible with the ideal of freedom; allowing secessionists to destroy it (in response to a democratic election) was not. In other words, Lincoln did not believe that true freedom was letting states do their own thing--and letting the pillars of American constitutional democracy run amok--but instead, in maintaining a union where the great experiment of democracy could flourish. As Lincoln himself said quite clearly in the Gettysburg Address, he was committed to making sure "...that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth." I suppose you can argue that Lincoln's vision of freedom was not worth the price, but you cannot deny that he had a vision of freedom--and that, for him, this vision was compatible with maintaining the historic, unprecedented political freedom that was achieved in 1776.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
just trust me i did this question before pretty sure it c
