Answer:
$46.43
Explanation:
Calculation for Below what stock price level would you get a margin call
First step is to calculate the Loan amount
Loan amount=(100 shares × $130 × 0.5
Loan amount= $6,500 × 0.5 = $3,250
Now let calculate Stock price level
0.30 = (100P $3,250)/100P
30 - P = 100P - $3,250
30-100P= - $3,250
-70P = -$3,250
P=$3,250/70
P = $46.43
Therefore Below what stock price level would you get a margin call will be $46.43
Answer:
March 31
Dr. Payroll Tax Expense: 3071.25
Cr. FICA- Social security taxes payable:
1395
Cr. FICA- Medicare taxes payable:
326.25
Cr. SUTA-State unemployment taxes payable:
1215
Cr. FUTA- Federal unemployment taxes payable: 135
Explanation:
March 31
Dr. Payroll Tax Expense: 3071.25
Cr. FICA- Social security taxes payable:
(6.2%×$2,250) 1395
Cr. FICA- Medicare taxes payable:
(1.45%×$2,250) 326.25
Cr. SUTA-State unemployment taxes payable:
(5.4$×$2,250) 1215
Cr. FUTA- Federal unemployment taxes payable: (0.6%×$2,250) 135
A. online job sites
because most company handbooks have performance reviews, medical ad family leave and standards of conduct.
Answer:
a. $3.5 per share
b. $1.49 per share
c. $38.38 per share
d. 1.93 times
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. Earning per share = (Net income) ÷ (Number of shares)
where,
Net income = Additions to retained earnings + cash dividends
= $261,000 + $194,000
= $455,000
So, the earning per share equal to
= $455,000 ÷ 130,000 shares
= $3.5 per share
b. Dividend per share = (Total dividend) ÷ (number of shares)
= ($194,000) ÷ (130,000 shares)
= $1.49 per share
c. Book value per share = (Total equity) ÷ (number of shares)
= ($4,990,000) ÷ (130,000 shares)
= $38.38 per share
d. Market to book ratio = (Market price per share) ÷ (book value per share)
= $74 ÷ $38.38
= 1.93 times
Hello,
Question - The U.S. Supreme Court case United States v. Bagley compels the prosecution to disclose any evidence that the _________ requests.
Answer - "evidence that the defense requests"
Why - "Bagley claimed that the government had violated his due process rights by withholding evidence that the defense could have utilized to impeach the witnesses. The district court held that the evidence was not material because the outcome would have been the same. "
