The answer is A. When both sides agree. You both have to agree to the same thing or there is no comprimise its just two peoples opinions...
Answer:
Related to the transferred equipment, the items that is true regarding the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2013 is:
C. The consolidation entries will include a $26,000 debit to "Gain on Sale of Equipment."
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Original cost of the equipment to the parent = $180,000
Transfer of equipment to subsidiary = (118,000)
Accumulated depreciation to December 31, (36,000)
Unaccounted balance = 26,000
b) The unaccounted balance of $26,000 needs to be credited to the parent's Equipment account to remove it from the account. This will have a corresponding debit entry in another account. The only correct entry among the options is C.
Answer:
standing
Explanation:
Standing -
It refers to the situation , when the party who has filed the complaint on the court is not able to show any proof for the case filed , is referred to as standing .
It refers to the type of some medical report , any eye witness ,or any clue or proof against the other party , can be provided to the court .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct term is standing .
Answer:
good hope you're doing great!
- The district court will first determine if there is a conflict between state and federal law with regard to the matter at hand before deciding whether to apply state or federal law.
- If there is a contradiction between the appropriate state and federal laws, the district court must determine whether a valid federal statute or Federal Rule addresses the contested matter.
- If there is no applicable federal act or regulation, the court must decide whether federal common law or state law should be applied.
- When a "uniquely federal interest" is at risk and a considerable conflict arises between that interest and the operation of state law, the Supreme Court has also acknowledged the application of federal common law.
<h3>Federal district court took decision -</h3>
- If there are significant, overriding federal interests at stake that require the application of federal law, a federal court may still apply federal common law.
- Such federal interests are evident in this case, as was previously discussed.
Learn more about federal district court brainly.com/question/12368109
#SPJ4
