Answer:
What do peasant farmers do when they lost their crops?
Peasant farmers often depended on <em>subsistence agriculture</em> - this means that the farmers primarily grew crops to feed themselves and their families, rather than selling their crops for economic gain.
So, if the peasant farmers lose their crops, they will have nothing to eat. The peasants will probably go hungry and perhaps starve.
And what common pattern do we see when the masses are starving? They <em>revolt </em>! I suppose that's a bit of a stretch, but in general, the peasant class would definitely be upset at having no crops to feed themselves and their children. Such tensions will be directed at their leader or "King" who is supposed to be prepared for any disaster.
Wouldn't people think, "The leader has everything he wants and can get anything he does not have, can't he share with us?"
Anyways, that's how I would interpret this question.
Hope this helps!
:D
Answer:
Wealth among European working classes
Explanation:
Considering that New Imperialism is characterized by the form of colonialism whereby many Europeans including the likes of the United States, Russia, and Japan controlled the resources and affairs of smaller nations or territories across the continents.
During this period, the colonial countries or masters brought their working class to the colonized territories and work there such that they earn more money and accumulate more wealth compared to the previous period.
Hence, Wealth among European working classes is what grew during the New Imperialism
The National Assembly of France.
This was illegal according to the laws of the time, but the 3rd Estate was declaring those laws and rules as a system that opposed the will and well-being of the people of France.
The old laws on the books said that when a gathering of the Estates General occurred, each of the three estates met separately and each group had one collective vote (the consensus of the whole group) as their final vote. The 1st Estate (clergy) and 2nd Estate (nobility), representing 2% of the population total, would combine their votes in opposition to the vote of the 3rd Estate (the common people). The 3rd Estate essentially declared that they, 98% of the nation, were the nation and that their delegates thus were the National Assembly.
There's more to the story than that, but we'll keep it brief here for now!
I believe the answer is: b They should start a political action committee and lobby for antismoking policies.
Through the political action committee, those group of people could help a certain representative to win the election, either through giving financial help or by promoting the candidate. In exchange, when the candidate is selected, the candidate would help to pass the legislation that wanted by the group of citizens.
I’d say A
Sorry if I’m wrong
