Is there any other info to help answer this question?
<span>Hamlet, Act III Scene I - here are some ideas and two videos to start the comparison.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fO-wxlavDQI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7EH0FxJVCs
It could be seen that these videos are recorded in different times and by different actors. As regards the 1st one, both are well- known today and it seems that it was done many years ago. the 2nd might show a modern version in a theater not in a setting and with a poorer production.
As in the 1st one the actors are dressed according to the time and props are used to represent Shakespearean years the 2nd presents no props, no scenario just actors without even wearing customs.
</span>
The second version might show actors standing and sitting while the 1st one that are always standing.
The 1st video seems to have lost colour maybe because of the pass of time and the 2nd presents bright colours. As regards the camera shots in the 1st video, it could be seen some close-ups and distance shootings while in the second the camera is pretty near the actors.
Answer:
c. the answer is c jus took the test
Explanation:
The rhetorical device which best describes the example shown is; Choice C; Allusion.
<h3>Antithesis and Allusion as Rhetorical devices</h3>
Antithesis is used in literature in writing or speech either as a proposition that contrasts with or reverses some previously mentioned proposition, or when two opposites are introduced together for contrasting effect.
An allusion put simply, is when one hints at something and expect the other person to understand what we are referencing.
Hence, it follows particularly from the line; "You know Donna Weems as the Shakespeare of our school" that the rhetorical device is; Allusion.
Read more on Rhetorical device;
Yes, I believe it's possible. You can potentially narrow your topic down so much that you leave no place to make any strong arguments or counter-claims.
