1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maxonik [38]
3 years ago
5

40 POINTS!!! NO COPY & PASTE!! WILL REPORT!! BEST ANSWER GETS BRAINLIEST! MULTI-PARAGRAPH PLEASEE!!

History
2 answers:
bekas [8.4K]3 years ago
5 0

The Latin poet Horace famously said "Graecia capta ferum victorem cepit ("Captive Greece captured her crude conqueror"). This line is intended to reflect the reality that although Rome was a great military power and managed to conquer Greece. Culturally, however, Greek ideas and models dominated Rome. The famous rhetorician Quintilian talks about how upper-class Romans had Greek slaves raising their children and says that these children actually spoke Greek better than Latin.

makkiz [27]3 years ago
4 0

Religion

The Romans were quite content to swipe most of the religion of the Greeks. Many of the gods served the same function with different names in both religions. You could quote Adonis[agriculture,<em><u>resurrection</u></em>], Apollo(light, prophecy), Pluto(The underworld), even some minor ones like Iris [rainbow], Others had a name change but served the same function. Eros (Greek),Cupid(sexual love). The point is that you have to understand that religion for the Romans was more or less a social convention rather than some deep rooted theology that needed slavish obedience. Easy come, easy go. The Greeks on the other hand were much more spiritual if you will. Their playwrights and poets were very careful about how they interpreted what the Gods did and how they did it. The Greeks called it as they saw it. The gods were not perfect; they could exhibit a wide variety of human foibles which the ordinary Greek citizen had best beware of. Offending the Gods was a very serious crime, but the Jehovah doesn't take kindly to that either.

The Romans paid homage to the Gods (women more than men -- sound familiar?), but they were much more tolerant, until the offense became political. Then there was all sorts of H*ll to pay. The whole history of Christianity and Rome can be summed up in the Crucifixion. Rome really didn't want to do anything about Jesus: they considered him a harmless gadfly. But that is what the crowd wanted (mostly Pharisees), and so Pilot gave Christ to them.

Literature

Stylistically there was not much developed in Rome. The poetry was mostly written by men (what else is new?), in what I consider a man's style and background of interests. I don't know that anyone ever wrote a cookbook in either culture. I have a science background and my mother tried to teach me to cook (she was old world). We drove each other crazy. Her measuring devices below a cup was the palm of her hand. "Mom you could at least put that into tablespoons." The comment was lost on her. That was the same sort of "cookbook" used by the Romans and Greeks. There were comedies and tragedies (some like Oedipus Rex  are performed today. The plot is a classic: Oedipus was doomed to kill his father and sleep with his mother.)

Lest you think all Greek Theater was kind of far out, there were comedies. One of the most famous (my favorite actually) is Lysistrata. The plot is very interesting maybe even tempting for the modern woman. The plot centers around the women of Athens (Sparta and Thebes), to organize themselves to withhold sexual favors from their men. Though a comedy, it has really serious comments to make about the battle of the sexes in humanity. It is very political while at the same time being funny.

Roman really did not add anything revolutionary to this situation. Well, I have to leave this now and look at your other one. I don't know how much time I have today. If you need me to go through the other two parts, I will later on. Just leave me a note.


You might be interested in
After the Cold War, the United States had difficulty deciding when to use military force in other countries.
valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

After the Cold War, the United States did have some difficulty deciding when to use military force because during the Cold War, the Red Scare caused so much paranoia in the United States that they relentlessly used military force on other countries to try and prevent communism from spreading. During the Cold War, the United States messed up a lot of nations by executing/getting rid of their leaders that they feared would lead their countries to communism or not trade/give what the US wanted from their resources. Instead, they would replace those leaders with leaders they believed would help benefit the USA, and a result of this, many countries faced challenges with leaders they did not select. In the future, the US would learn actions have consequences when there was a rise of terrorism from countries that turned to a theocracy government after the USA took away their democratic leaders (ex: Iran).

8 0
3 years ago
According to Aristotle, which element of tragedy is the most important?
Alex Ar [27]
According to Aristotle, plot is the most important element of tragedy.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone please help me this is due in 2mins?!
bearhunter [10]

Answer:

D, A, C, B option is the correct one

Explanation:

Im sure

3 0
3 years ago
Why was the victory at midway so important to the allied forces?
jonny [76]
The answer is C. it put japan on the defensive
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Louisiana Purchase affect the nation's economy and politics
laila [671]
The Louisiana Purchase of 1803 doubled the size of the United States, gave the country complete control of the port of New Orleans, and provided territory for westward expansion.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who lived in longhouses
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following laws or events did NOT lead to growing tensions between the North and South?
    12·2 answers
  • What weaknesses made the league of nations an ineffective force for peace in the 1920s and 1930s?
    10·1 answer
  • What did john locke mean by commonwealth?
    7·1 answer
  • Chivalry was a A. contract between knights and their lord. B. musical style of the troubadours. C. political system of the Middl
    15·1 answer
  • Describe the main attributes of Islamic art.
    10·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the two competing constitutions in Kansas in 1855?
    15·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ME ASAP I'M BEING TIMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    8·2 answers
  • Alex is in a wheelchair goes to the public service building to pay a bill. Unfortunately the place she needs is on the 2nd floor
    8·1 answer
  • Japan, being an island nation, creates<br> many natural barriers<br> to invaders.<br> False<br> True
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!