The case arises between the states of Georgia and Florida relating to the flow of toxins from factories in Georgia to the water system of Florida. This dispute is handled by the Federal judicial branch.
Option D is the correct answer.
<h3>What is a judiciary branch?</h3>
The judiciary branch is the third tier of the federal government which is accountable for monitoring the implemented laws by the executive branch.
The provided case is initiated between two states, that is, Florida and Georgia in connection with the problem of increasing amounts of toxins in the water system of Florida due to pollutants released from the factories of Georgia. The case could not be resolved by the state legislatures of both the states and is heard and resolved by the federal branch of the judiciary.
Therefore, the provided case should be heard by the federal branch of the judiciary regarding the quarrel between two states.
Learn more about the judiciary branch in the related link:
brainly.com/question/1344523
#SPJ1
Answer:
Most states require that all electoral votes go to the candidate who receives the most votes in that state. After state election officials certify the popular vote of each state, the winning slate of electors meet in the state capital and cast two ballots—one for Vice President and one for President. Electors cannot vote for a Presidential and Vice Presidential candidate who both hail from an elector’s home state. For instance, if both candidates come from New York, New York’s electors may vote for one of the candidates, but not both. In this hypothetical scenario, however, Delaware’s electors may vote for both New York candidates. This requirement is a holdover from early American history when one of the country’s major political fault lines divided big states from small states. The founders hoped this rule would prevent the largest states from dominating presidential elections.
Explanation:
Hope this helps if not sorry
The statement that describes the distinction between British and French rule in Africa is D. France used direct rule, while Britain used indirect rule.
It should be noted that the main difference between the way the French and the British ruled African countries was that while the French used direct rule, the British used indirect rule.
The indirect rule implies a form of government whereby the governed people have certain legal, administrative, and other powers. While the British still have certain powers over the people they ruled, the French were direct in their approach.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25555071
The correct matches are:
Divided the Persian Empire into 20 provinces - Darius I;
Tolerated religions and customs of conquered people - Both;
Defeated the Medes and became the first leader of the Persian Empire - Cyrus the Great;
Established the capital called Persepolis - Darius I;
Created the Immortals, a force of 10,000 highly skilled warriors to serve him - Cyrus the Great;
Expanded the Persian Empire by conquering surrounding lands - Both;
Cyrus the Great and Darius I are both seen as excellent leaders and they have a place in the hearts of most Iranians even in the present. Both of them had numerous achievements. Cyrus the Great was the one that actually created the Persian Empire, created the legendary ''Immortals' managed to conquer new territories, but was also a very tolerant and generous leader. Darius I, also referred to as Darius the Great, managed to became the leader of the Persian Empire after the assassination of the usurper on the throne. He later managed to implement numerous political reforms, conquered even more territories, and ordered the building and establishing of the capital Persepolis which was a real miracle in the antiquity.
