1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rudiy27
3 years ago
15

Help i cant find answer

History
1 answer:
Olegator [25]3 years ago
8 0
D) the label “Boston Massacre” in inaccurate.
You might be interested in
An idea used to justify the ever-westward spread of american citizens was called:
GrogVix [38]
<span>This idea is known as Manifest Destiny. It made American citizens believe that all the land in North America belonged to them and it was their God given right to claim it as their own. The citizens would use any tactic to claim uncharted territory or territory already being lived on. This idea fueled Western expansion in the United States.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes the constitutional amendment process?
SVEN [57.7K]

"It is an intentionally tough procedure in which an amendment must be proposed and accepted by 2/3 of Congress or 2/3 of the state legislature before it can be ratified by 3/4 of the States" best characterizes altering the Option C

This is further explained below.

<h3>What is the constitutional amendment process?</h3>

Generally, A convention may be convened for the purpose of proposing an amendment to the Constitution if two-thirds of the states seek it, or if both houses of Congress vote in favor of it with a majority of two-thirds.

After then, the amendment must to be approved by three-fourths of the state legislatures or by three-fourths of the conventions that have been convened for ratification in each state.

In conclusion, The response that is most appropriate and adequately describes the process of amending the Constitution is as follows: "It is a purposefully difficult process in which an amendment must be proposed and approved by 2/3 of Congress or 2/3 of the state legislature before it can be ratified by 3/4 of the States."

Read more about the constitutional amendment process

brainly.com/question/19071469

#SPJ1

CQ

Which statement best describes the constitutional amendment process?

It is a unique process in which the public proposes in a minute and votes on it in a special election before sending it to the Supreme Court which can ratify it if 5 of the 9 judges agree that its constitutional.

It is a secretive process in which an amendment is proposed by The Secret ballot before being approved or vetoed by the president who then lobbies Congress to ratify it.

It isn't intentionally difficult process in which an amendment must be proposed and approved by 2/3 of Congress or 2/3 of the state legislative before being ratified by 3 fourths of the States

It is a simple process in which an amendment must be introduced and approved by a simple majority in the Congress and at least half of the States

3 0
1 year ago
Which Empire lasted only 100 years and which lasted 300 years
Charra [1.4K]

The Mongol Empire lasted only 100 years.

The Mali Empire lasted a little more than 300 years.
7 0
3 years ago
Discuss the supremacy of the constitution
MrRissso [65]
In the United States, the Constitution is the ultimate "law of the land," meaning that the federal government has sovereignty over the states--although some powers are "shared". 
7 0
3 years ago
(NEED HELP) In this assignment, you will write a three- to four-paragraph Supreme Court opinion for
liberstina [14]

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane D. Kirstein, U .S. Attorney's Office, San Antonio, TX, Plaintiff–Appellee. Laura G. Greenberg, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Bradford W. Bogan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender's Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant–Appellant.

In this case, we must decide whether the district court's imposition of a condition of supervised release prohibiting the defendant from “residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer” was plainly erroneous. We conclude it was not and AFFIRM.

I.

In January 1990, Michael Fields was convicted in Wisconsin state court of second degree sexual assault of a child.1 He was sentenced to five years in prison, but only served one year; the rest of his term was probated. Fields was required to register as a sex offender in Wisconsin for the rest of his life. Because of this conviction, he must also register as a sex offender in Texas. Fields has thrice been arrested and convicted for failing to register as a sex offender.2 He has also been repeatedly told by state authorities in both Wisconsin and Texas that he must register as a sex offender, instructions with which it appears he has never complied.3

Fields was arrested by the Austin Police Department for failing to register as a sex offender in April 2013. The next month, he was indicted in federal court and charged with one count of failing to register as a sex offender in violation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”).4 After unsuccessfully moving to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that SORNA was unconstitutional, Fields pled guilty in July 2013.

In November 2013, Fields appeared before the district court for his sentencing hearing. At that hearing, the court reviewed Fields's criminal history record, and concluded that, even discounting several convictions where it was disputed as to whether Fields committed the crime, he had “a solid criminal record since 1974.” After hearing from counsel, the court then sentenced Fields to a 27–month sentence of imprisonment, followed by ten years of supervised release. The supervision included a number of conditions, including, as relevant here, a requirement that:

The defendant shall follow all other lifestyle restrictions or treatment requirements imposed by the therapist, and continue those restrictions as they pertain to avoiding risk situations throughout the course of supervision. This includes not residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer.

Fields did not object to this condition. This timely appeal follows.

II.

We normally review conditions of supervised release for abuse of discretion.5 In this case, because Fields did not object to his supervised release condition while before the district court, we review for plain error.6 As the Supreme Court has made clear, plain error is a demanding standard:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • All of the following are associated with the cuban revolution of the 1890s except:
    14·1 answer
  • How does the executive branch ensure that the legislative branch stays in its proper plae
    15·1 answer
  • What was a result of the “Compromise of 1877”? A. It brought an end to Reconstruction. B. It brought an end to Jim Crow laws in
    13·2 answers
  • What is the correct definition of the word fodder?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an accurate statement What evidence do historians use to show that the maya had advanced knowledge of
    5·1 answer
  • Why was Martin Luther King so concerned by the issue of poverty in America?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did some<br> Americans disagree<br> with Spain over the<br> ownership of West<br> Florida?
    10·1 answer
  • What flags are some southern whites holding up yo show disdain for March​
    14·2 answers
  • WHEN AND WHERE ARE VOTES COUNTED IN NATIONAL ELECTIONS? <br><br><br> someone answer this!?
    15·1 answer
  • Please summarize the roles of African Americans in the Civil War.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!