The answer is durable. According to AR 735-5 (Policies and Procedures for Property Accountability), a durable property is a property that is not consumed in use, does not require property book accountability, but because of its unique characteristics requires control when issued to the user. The best example for this is hand tools. Hand tools are measured durable because they are not used up by Soldier unlike cleaning supplies. Hand tools are not on the property book. They do require a signature when issued, whether from the tool room or the supply room. When hand tools break, they must be turned in for replacements. Soldiers who misplace hand tools pay for the lost tools in order to implement supply discipline. We must have supply discipline to save Army resources for deployments, training exercises and other mission requirements. Leaders involve periodic inventories and the correct hand receipt procedures for the same reason. Hand tools are costly and Soldiers use millions of them. So, hand tools are durable because they do not get used up, unlike consumable supplies such as hand soap or motor oil, and also require some type of control when issued.
Answer:
The use of a proper CRM.
Explanation:
A CRM basically means or translate to a Customer Management System.
A customer management system is an Information technology tool or software that enables companies to properly manage track and monitor their interactions and relationship with clients or potential customers.
Referring back to the question asked, the best answer to the question is to categories or segment the customer management system into teams and generate a unique assess code such that only the team working on a particular potential customer can access and monitor the status of interaction between a sales person and a customer within the same sales team.
This way, a third party sales team does not have access to the data of other sales team.
Answer:
Only one seller.
Explanation:
A monopoly is a market structure which is typically characterized by a single-seller (one seller) who sells a unique product in the market by dominance. This ultimately implies that, it is a market structure wherein the seller has no competitor because he is solely responsible for the sale of unique products without close substitutes.
Also, a monopolist refers to any individual that deals with the sales of unique products in a monopolistic market.
For example, a public power supply company is an example of a monopoly because it serve as the only source of power supply to the general public in a society.
A public power company refers to a company that provides power (electricity) utility to the general public of a society.
In conclusion, a monopoly is a market that has only one seller.
Answer: Hello your question is incomplete attached below is the complete question
answer:
1) attached below
2) Net operating income ( loss ) = - $104 million
Explanation:
Pretax operating loss = - $137 million
Non deductible Losses ; $5 million fine paid in 2021 ,
estimated $12 million loss from contingency that will be tax deductible in 2022
Enacted tax rate = 25%
Taxable operating income = - $120 million
attached below is the solution
Answer:
Jobs argument
Explanation:
-The national-security argument states that some industries have to be protected by imposing tariffs to maintain the local production in case of a war.
-The unfair-competition argument says that the domestic market has to be protected when there is unfair competition because companies from other countries are subject to different regulations.
-Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument states that the threat of imposing a restriction can help to eliminate a restriction that was imposed by another country.
-Infant-industry argument says that new industries have to be protected because they don't have economies of scales that their competitors from others countries have.
-The jobs argument claims that the trade with other countries eliminates the local jobs.
According to this, the answer is that the senator is using the jobs argument to argue for the trade restriction on steel rods because he claims that it is necessary to impose those restrictions to protect the workers from losing their jobs.
