Given a conditional statement p → q, which statement is logically equivalent?
2 answers:
(p -> q) <=> ( (~p) v q ) ~p -> ~q <=> p v (~q) //not equivalent ~q -> ~p <=> (~(~q) v ~p) <=> ((~p) v q) //equivalent q -> p <=> q v (~p) //not equivalent p -> ~q
<=> p v q //not equivalent answer: ~q -> ~p logically equivalent to p -> q
Hello, p=>q is equivalent to ~q → ~p p-------q-------p=>q--~q ----- ~p----~q → ~p 0-------0-------1-------1 ------- 1------- 1 0-------1-------1-------0------- 1------- 1 1-------0-------0-------1------- 0-------0 1-------1-------1-------0------- 0-------1 Column 3= column 6 ==>equivalent Answer B
You might be interested in
Answer:
no
Step-by-step explanation:
iT CANNOT BE A SOLUTION
You have to make a problem that could happen in the real world that multiplication of a fracton using product between 10 and 15
Answer:
0
Step-by-step explanation:
5*0=0
0^4=0
0^-3=0
The answer is 2 pounds for $1 because you divide 4 by 2 then divide 2 by 2 so 2 pounds for $1.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
(-2,-2) , (5,-5)
(-2,-2), m= -3/7
Line equation: y -y1 =m*(x -x1)
y-(-2) = -(-3/7)(x - [-2])