Given a conditional statement p → q, which statement is logically equivalent?

2 answers:

7 0

(p -> q) <=> ( (~p) v q )

~p -> ~q <=> p v (~q) //not equivalent
~q -> ~p <=> (~(~q) v ~p) <=> ((~p) v q) //equivalent
q -> p <=> q v (~p) //not equivalent
p -> ~q <=> p v q //not equivalent

answer: ~q -> ~p logically equivalent to p -> q

svlad2 [7]3 years ago

3 0

Hello,
p=>q is equivalent to ~q → ~p

p-------q-------p=>q--~q ----- ~p----~q → ~p
0-------0-------1-------1 ------- 1------- 1
0-------1-------1-------0------- 1------- 1
1-------0-------0-------1------- 0-------0
1-------1-------1-------0------- 0-------1

Column 3= column 6 ==>equivalent

Answer B

You might be interested in

The demand for video recorders has been estimated to be Qv = 134 − 1.07Pf + 46Pm − 2.1Pv − 5I, where Qv is the quantity of video

stepladder [879]

Answer:

The Video recorders are inferior goods.

Step-by-step explanation:

As $Q_{v} =134-1.07Pf+46Pm-2.1Pv-5I$

where;

The price of the recorders films are increasing by a term 1.07 which gives that the Price is increasing by a little. Also adding the Price of video recorder is increasing by a factor 2.1 and the Revenue or income is increasing by a term 5 (Which is high) so, revenue and price are increasing leaving the quality of the voice recorder decreasing by a large margin for maintaining the balance.

$Revenue =price*Quality$