Answer:
1) The range is found by subtracting the minimum data entry from the maximum data entry.
2) It is easy to compute.
3) It uses only two entries from the data set.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following information in the question:
1) Range is difference between the highest value and the lowest value of the data.
- To find the range we first arrange the data in the increasing order and then select the highest and the lowest value of the data, Then the lowest value is subtracted from the highest value to find the range.
Option A) The range is found by subtracting the minimum data entry from the maximum data entry.
2) Advantage of range as a measure of variation.
- Since the method to calculate range of a data set is very easy, it is one of the advantages to use range as a method of variation.
Option B) It is easy to compute.
3) Disadvantage of range to use as a method of variation.
- The disadvantage of using range is that it does not measure the spread of the data set
- It only measures the spread between highest and lowest data points in data set.
Option C) It uses only two entries from the data set.
-2x + y =3
use 5 number and put it in above equation to find y, I will use -2,-1,0,1,2
x y
-2 -1
-1 1
0 3
1 5
2 7
Then draw the graph, find another point in the graph which intersect the slope,
lets say i found (-3,-3)which is on the slope
to prove it, i put (-3,-3) in the equation -2x + y = 3
and i got
3 = 3
Thus it is correct.
Hey there! :D
Since all the terms are being added together, and there is a common denominator with the fractions, we can just add them.
x+x= 2x 3/4+2/4= 5/4
2x+5/4
2x+1.25<== simplest form
I hope this helps!
~kaikers
8/2.79 = 1/2.867, or $2.86 per each oz
15/5.54 = 2.707/1, or 2 oz for every 1 dollar
the 15 oz jar of salsa has the better unit rate
hope this helps
Answer:
0.09
Step-by-step explanation:
avg rate of change is: change in y/ change in x
so it´d be 3.59 - 0.89 / 2014 - 1984
= 2.7/ 30
= 0.09
note:
The slope formula and the average rate of change formula are the same, just written a bit different, so you could also use:
y2 - y1 / x2 - x1
