I personally think that both would be a good idea. It also depends on how bad the budget deficit is. if the government would raise taxes by like 1% it wouldn't be to bad. they could also not give as many funds to things that arn't important like maybe a science investigation that isn't very useful. but if they would decrease spendings on, for exaple medicare that would effect people in a not so good way. but if they raised taxes too much it could also effect people badly. hope this helped
Answer:
Modest short term deterrent, but will need mass executions to be effective
Explanation:
The question has already been answered but I guess you need an explanation.
In the deterrence theory by Professor Land and his colleagues, they assumes that offenders are rational, I.e. they know the law and the penalties attached to defaulting the law..
They're are three points to take note of in this study;
1. For execution to have a deterrent effect, then it means a huge number of execution must have taken place
2. Most of any deterrent effect of execution of homicide occurs immediately after the execution is made public
3. 5 to 10 homicides would deterred in a year if there are 10 to 20 executions using 0.5 homicides deterred on a monthly basis.
Answer:
Schema
Explanation:
A Grading Schema is a mapping of percentage ranges to a specific grade display. When a Grading Schema is employed (depending on the grade), the Grade Center will translate the percentage score and display the corresponding value based on the schema.
