Answer: Laissez-faire capitalism refers to a system that allows very little room for the national government to regulate trade or restrict the use of private property, even in the public interest.
Explanation: Laissez-faire capitalism is an expression that represents a policy of allowing free movement and opposing interventionism. This term literally means "let it work" in French. It is primarily about free market advocacy. In other words, lawmakers are opposed to state interference in market flows and often identify with liberals.
In developed countries, the differences between men's and women's use of leisure have narrowed.
It would be your second choice because the definition of the word matches your answer.
Answer:
A) Yes, as his conduct was intentional.
Explanation:
While Adam was only playing a practical joke, his own common sense should have said to him that stage a robbery even with the intention of a joke could provoke emotional distress in people.
When it comes to jokes, it is important to remember that there are subjects that we are all scared about and some people react in different ways, so while his intention was not about inflicting emotional distress, his conduct was one hundred percent intentional.
Making jokes is ok but in a contest where people do not feel emotional distress because of them.
Answer:
(C) The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
Explanation:
State laws have more authority than local laws. For this reason, when a statuary law is sanctioned, it must replace existing local laws for the same subject. It is at this point that we can observe what the problem with the petition shown in the above question may be, making this petition circulating misleading to some readers.
Many cities, counties, and others have local smocking restriction laws that are much broader than the state law the petition wants to be sanctioned. Some people do not understand the relationship between state and local laws and will think this state law will help local smocking restriction law, when in fact state law will replace it.