Answer:True
Explanation: Postmodernist have high scepticism and they hold various views such as (1) they believe there is no objective reality , what ever is thought to be real is subjective (2) They deny the existence of scientific or historical truth (3) They consider technological development as just instrument of power.(4) They don't consider logic and reason as universally valid. (5) They don't consider knowledge to be certain.
I believe the answer is: A. <span>A ZIP code has five numbers, and is most likely to be remembered.
Rule of seven stated that you need to at least repeat a certain things seven plus-minus-two times for it to be remembered.
Which means that the total 5 numbers in a zip-code could be related to this rule of seven.</span>
Answer:
The different agencies involved are: Social Services Police Health Services NSPCC Children’s social care Social Services
Explanation:
Source is G o o g l e
Let me know if it's wrong
Answer:
Inductive
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning creates wide conclusions from certain observations, just as in this case study, the rate of murder. Majorly, there is data (in our case study- This pattern holds true, even when she controls for population differences (so it is not due to more people living in northern cities)), then generalizations are made from the data (from our case study--greater "culture of violence" in the south produces higher murder rates). This is often referred to as inductive logic, according to Utah State University.
"In inductive inference, there is a shift from an actual one to general form. We make many notations, create a pattern, make a conclusion, and create an explanation or a theory," Wassertheil-Smoller told Live Science. "In science, there is a constant interconnection among inductive inference (based on notations) and deductive inference (based on theory), until we arrive in proximity to the 'truth,' by not just approaching but to be able to prove with total certainty."
Another instance of inductive logic is, "when a person pulls out a coin from a bag and it happened to be a penny. On reaching out the second time, the person also picked a penny, and at the third time, a third coin from the bag is also a penny. It will bring the person to make a generalization that all the coins in the bag are pennies."
Even if the entire premises are correct in a statement, inductive reasoning permits for the generalization to be false. Another example "Semai is a grandmother. Semai is bald. Therefore, all grandmothers are bald." The generalization does not comply logically from the statements.
