I cannot really see the paper because the adjustment of the brightness
I think that Adam Smith would be more supportive of globalization of multinational corporations since his major work, the Wealth of Nations dealt with the workings of the capitalist system and supported it. I think that Karl Marx would be strongly opposed to the control that the multi-nationals have over their neo-colonies but at the same time would applaud the way that globalization has developed solidarity between the working class of the different countries such as between the major capitalist countries and the so-called Third World countries.
D. the north had organized schools.
Explanation:
......
He wanted to inform the country about the war and provide comfort for them during the depression
The most logical generalization is letter b. people in rural areas have smaller dating pool than people in urban areas.
<em>People in rural areas do not necessarily have an advantage with dating applications because everyone knows everyone, the number of people is much smaller, and they are people who naturally have a culture of approaching one to another.</em>
- <u>Itens a.</u> (dating applications do not often lead to romantic partnerships) <u>and d.</u> (most rural residents have located romantic partners through dating applications) > Both are distant from the contextualization of the passage.
- <u>Iten c.</u> (fewer rural residents than urban residents have smart phones) > It is not a generalization. It is another kind of conclusion. Not all conclusions are generalizations.
