Https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_differences_in_suicide
Answer:
Option C, strict scrutiny, is the right answer.
Explanation:
In the process of judicial review, Strict scrutiny is a kind of method which is used to appraise the constitutionality of a law. In simple terms, it is a standard of review. This method of reviewing is usually employed when the individual rights of a person are infringed upon or when the Bill of Rights is violated.
It is also used when laws which involve Suspect classifications are possibly being violated.
The answer is "<span>Today's older people are happier than college students."
</span>
A cross-sectional study is a kind of observational investigation that dissects information from a populace, or an agent subset, at a particular point in time, that is, cross-sectional data. Cross-sectional examinations are instinctively clear and take into consideration the examination of countless. The strategies can be institutionalized by the scientist, and obvious definitions can be connected to the presentation and the endpoints.
Well germany’s economy was terrible after world war one (if that’s the war that you’re talking about) and the economy in the US during the depression was also obviously terrible. there was a lot of inflation in both regions.
A. voting rights could not be denied based on race.
B. voting rights could not be denied based on gender.
C. poll taxes became illegal and unconstitutional.
D. literacy tests became illegal and unconstitutional.
The fifteenth amendment states that "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of <em>race</em>, <em>color</em>, or <em>previous condition of servitude</em>."
There was no mention of gender, so voting for women hadn't been legalized until 1919, making B wrong.
