Answer:
Professional image is mandatory in finding the employment.
Explanation:
Presenting a professional image plays an important role in finding employment. It is our behavior, appearance, and way of communicating that help in attracting employment.
If our appearance is not appealing and our communication skills are weak and our behavior is not as per the requirements of the job then we might face difficulty in getting a job. Professional presentation is vital and expected by the person recruiting the employees.
Answer:
465 minutes or 8 hours and 15 minutes
Step-by-step explanation:
her monthly bill was 72.25 and she has to pay 2.50 per month
72.25 - 2.50 = 69.75
69.75/ 0.15 = 645 minutes
645 minutes/ 60 minutes= 7.75 = 8 hours 15 minutes
Answer:
One of the great dangers in allocating common fixed corporate costs is that such allocations can make a product line look less profitable than it really is.
Explanation:
Therefore, care must be exercised so that a product line is not eliminated because the common fixed costs have been allocated to it such that it becomes unprofitable. This is why it is necessary to identify activity cost pools into which such fixed costs can be accumulated and from which they can be allocated to product lines. Using ABC costing approach, for instance, offers a means of escape because the system tries to allocate costs based on the level of usage or consumption of such common costs by each product line instead of using arbitrary allocation formulas.
Answer:
U.S. Tax Burden on Cola:
The amount of the tax on a case of cola is $4 per case. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $1 per case, and the burden that falls on producers is ___$3______ per case.
The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers.
a. True
b. False
Explanation:
The tax burden on consumers, which is represented by the difference in the price of cola from $5 to $6 per unit is $1 ($6 - $5). However, the cash received by producers reduced by $3 from $5 to $2. This shows that the total tax burden on both consumers and producers is $4 ($1 + $3).
This represents a total tax burden of $4 or about 67% based on the new selling price of cola or 80% based on the old selling price of cola.
"The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers alone. This because the price of cola would have increased to $9 per unit. Since the demand for cola in this instance is elastic, this change in price would have caused a more than 80% change in the quantity demanded.
