Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": SWOT's focus on the external environment is too broad and integrative.
Explanation:
The SWOT analysis is a study of the internal and external factors that influence companies' operations and from which the entity can take advantage of or steps to control risks. The <em>internal factors</em> are the Strengths and Weaknesses while the <em>external components</em> are the Opportunities and Threats of the firm.
<em>The SWOT's focus on the external environment is broad and integrative but such characteristic represents an advantage not a limitation of this strategic study.</em>
Answer:
Net Income = $1,250
Explanation:
Benning Co.
Income Statement
For the Month Ended July 31, 2010
Particulars $ $
Revenues 6,000 (1)
Expenses:
Wages Expense 2,600 (2)
Supplies Expense 1,000 (3)
Utilities Expense 600
Insurance Expense 400
Depreciation Expense 150
<em>Total expenses </em><u><em> 4,750 </em></u>
Net Income $1,250
<u><em>Note:</em></u>
1. Revenues = 5,500 + 500 (Adjustment 5) = $6,000
Performed services not recorded will add.
2. Wages expense = $2,300 + 300 (Adjustment 3) = $2,600
Accrued wages not paid will add to the wages expense.
3. Supplies Expense = $1,200 - 200 (Adjustment 2) = $1,000
Supplies expense includes supplies on hand will decrease the supplies expense.
The Washburn guitars reduces their price from $2,499 to $2,699 as a result of the sales of the product drastically increased by 30%, So this represents that the <u>product has an elastic demand.</u>
<h3>What do you mean by elastic demand?</h3>
When the price of a product has a massive effect on the quantity purchased is called Elastic demand. A product is stated to have an elastic demand if sales drop sharply in reaction to a growth in price, or sales spike whilst prices are decreased.
Thus, The Washburn guitars reduces their price from $2,499 to $2,699 as a result of the sales of the product drastically increased by 30%, So this represents that the <u>product has an elastic demand.</u>
Learn more about elastic demand:
brainly.com/question/5078326
#SPJ1
This question is a bit tricky to answer because it does not state how often interest rate is applied so lets say for the simple 5% interest rate the rate of interest was calculated after 2 years you would pay a total interest of $15 since interest was only calculated once but for the 3% calculating every year with compound it would be a total of 18.27 dollars in interest but then you would have to calculate the 5% simple interest the same way which would total to $30 if calculated once a year being more than the 3% compound. But lets say interest is calculated once a month your total for the 5% simple interest would be $360 dollars interest for those 2 years and the 3% compound would be $406.97 dollars in interest. So over all the less amount of times interest compounds the less interest there is making it more worth than the simple but if the compounding occurs more frequently the simple 5% interest is more worth it. In this situation I think it might just be yearly interest which makes the 3% compound more worth taking for this short amount of time.
I think it’s either the last one or the first one sorry if I’m wrong
