Answer:
The statement that would prove that Zeke made a faulty decision is that Both an employee and a a former employee can raised a grievance
Explanation:
Based on the information given about Zeke who is the employer , Gavin the employee and the formal employee who was dismissed The statement that would prove that Zeke the employer made a faulty decision is that Both an employee and the former or ex employee can raised a grievance reason been that settling dispute due to Grievance at a place of work can only take place with a current employee and not a formal employee , ex employee or a dismissed employee.
Therefore resolving Grievance at a place of work often take place with an employee with in the work environment and not with a formal employee.
Answer:
Protected status
Explanation:
In simple words, the trade secret is said to be protected when it has an economic value to the founding company or the company handling it and anyone who is exposed to the information regarding that is legally bound to not to disclose it.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the given scenario indicates protected status.
Answer:
It is $30,000(C)
Explanation:
Depreciable cost = $90,000
Using straight-line method,
Annual depreciation = $90,000/3
= $30,000.
Hence, depreciation expense at the final year of service is $30,000
We cannot make use of entire cost of equipment of $120,000 because it seemed the company wanted to sell its scrap value for $30,000. Hence, this has been used to reduced it cost to $90,000 which is a depreciable cost .
