Throughout the last 30 years, there have been significant changes regarding the media that is used to reach the masses. Regarding Politics, parties have had to readjust their campaign budgets in order to reassign funds to other forms of media that were not present prior to the '90s like the internet and social media platforms.
Politicians must now enter the competition for the votes in these platforms. This is much more demanding, as the speed that information is propagated is numerous times much higher than it was before the internet. A misunderstood post may represent a significant loss in voters.
Answer:
International division of labour.
Explanation:
The separation of work into number of tasks is known as division of Labor.
It is important for the economic progress because it allows the people to specialise in particular tasks. The specialisation makes them more efficient and reduces the cost of total production.
International division of labour is the process that occurs when the production in not limited to national economies. According to the "old " International division of labour the underdeveloped countries were incorporated in the world economy as the supplier of agricultural commodities and minerals, It lasted till 1970's. While according to the theory of New International Division of Labour(NIDL) the manufacturing is shifting from advanced capitalist countries to developing countries.
This is an Anti-Federalist point of view
Anti-Federalists claimed that the Constitution gave the central government too much power. They wanted a weaker central government. At first, they opposed the ratification of the Constitution because of the supposed imbalance of powers.
Federals wanted a strong central government as they believed this was the key to a better nation.
The Bill of Rights was proposed to appease the Anti-Federalists.
Mainly it served as a wake up call for the Union on how bloody this war would be. The casualties were about 23,000 combined, the most ever up till that point (soon to be usurped by Chancellorsville).
It was also both a learning experience for Grant, a boost in recognition and at the same time being a detriment. In the immediate aftermath reports across the nation accused Grant of being drunk (among other things) and allowed to have his men to be bayoneted in their tents due to his lack of defensive preperations falsely. The public demanded Lincon remove Grant from command but he famously responded
I cannot spare this man; he fights.At the same time General Halleck reorganized the Army and shuffled Grant to the second in command position. He would only be in such a position for a short time until Halleck would be sent East and Grant would reassume control.
Grant instead took this as a learning experience on preparedness that helped him through the War. He realized that the War would not be decided and ended in one battle but instead in many others. He also was (eventually) recognized for his clear judgment under stress and his ability to see the greater strategic situation.
Sherman also became a national name in the immediate aftermath of Shilo. His steadfastness and calmness under fire during the battle made up for his previous melancholy and defensive lapses in previous engagements.
<span>In the larger view it ended Confederate hopes of stopping the Union Invasion of Mississippi. It also allowed for the two Union armies in Tenessee to link up, assuring Confederate defeats in both states. The Confederacy also suffered the loss of General Albert Johnson who was extremely talented.
</span>ω<span>i truely hope this helps</span>ω<span>
</span>
Answer:
Based on what I know about the changes and resources that helped the United States' industries to grow I would expect China's resources to increase as the years go by. Chinese industries are discovering new sources of raw materials to use, and Chinese cities are growing quickly. Natural resources are becoming more available.Between 1900 and 2006, total world steel production increased, and steel is becoming more useful as a building resource. Cities are becoming centers of manufacturing. In 2006, the United States produced more steel than it did in 1900, but China was the world's leading steel producer in 2006. In 1900, Europe had more steel-producing countries than other continents, but In 2006, the world's leading steel producers were located in Asia.
Explanation:
