Answer:
economy, modernized
Explanation:
The cause of Franco-Prussian War can be attributed to the events that surrounds German unification. After the Austro-Prussian War in 1866,Prussia has gotten alot of German territories and they formed the North German Confederation along with some German territories.Southern German states strongly opposed France with their annexation. One the
disruptive nation builders in France was Napoleon III, who was a nephew to Napoleon I, he was the France's first president, and reigned from year 1848 to 1852, he was also the last monarch in French monarch from year 1852 to 1870.
Some of the changes that was brought to France by Napoleon III are; the promotion of the building of the Suez Canal , he also bought about the establishment of modern agriculture, which brought an end to famines in France, and turned France to an agricultural exporter country. He negotiated the agreement of Cobden–Chevalier free trade in 1860 ,with Britain and other partners in European countries. It should be noted that the first of the disruptive nation builders was Napoleon III. He set out to create a lavish court, boost the economy, build railroads, and otherwise modernized France.
John D. Rockefeller, he created Standard oil and used a system of horizontal integration, which really hurt the consumer but it made him rich. He was basically a terrible person but a genius businessman (he would have been a trillionaire by today's standards) :)
Answer:What is the Shirer thesis?
Shirer's thesis: Germans didn't accept the Treaty of Versailles, although it was reasonable, nor did they accept their new government, the Weimar Republic. Germans bitterness towards the Treaty and their lack of support for the Weimar Republic caused Germany to be a “house divided” and facilitated the rise of Hitler.
Explanation:
Fugitive slave act i believe because of the fact that who ever found a runaway slave would be rewarded.
Longstreet was against the invasion of Pennslyvania. he thought the army should be trying to stop Grant from liberating the Mississpi area. Longstreet also knew that the Union positions were very strong and didn't think that the South would win very easily. He was strongly against unwanted bloodshed.
