Answer: All the above options are correct as the growth phase of a product life cycle.
Explanation: The only thing that could have affected the growth phase is if there is price competition with protracted price war which erodes profits.
On the off chance that finished with care and thinking ahead, changing work methodology can build profitability. Be that as it may if done shamefully, doing as such can without much of a stretch be counter profitable.
This incorporates knowing the dangers of their occupations and their work environment and knowing how to control these risks. Having composed safe work practices and techniques is a fundamental part of an OH&S program. A training is an arrangement of rules to enable specialists to play out an assignment that may not require a well-ordered strategy.
Answer:
B) Something a person is able to do.
Explanation:
On my assignment, got it correct.
Answer:
The data is missing, so I looked for a similar question (see attached image).
in a subgame perfect equilibrium, players take turns, one player (GM) will take turn an make an offer to the second player (Securitex), and then the second player will decide whether to accept the offer or not. The situations where the offer is rejected are not really an equilibrium since basically GM and Securitex get nothing out of the deal.
The two remaining options where Securitex accepts the offer must be analyzed in the following way:
After GM makes its move, is Securitex going to be better off or not. If GM makes a high offer and Securitex accepts it, then both will be better off. But if GM makes a low offer and Securitex accepts, it, GM will be better off but Securitex will be worse off, so that is not a real equilibrium.
The only option where a real equilibrium happens and is accepted by both, is that GM makes a high offer and Securitex accepts it. This would be option C.
Answer: Invest according to your risk appetite
Explanation:
The purpose of this question is to measure your risk appetite. There is therefore no right or wrong answer.
If you pick nothing, then you are very risk averse because you don't want to risk your salary on a venture with only a 20% chance of success.
If you would invest a month salary, you are not risk averse but you only have a moderate risk tolerance.
If you invest three months salary on a venture with a 20% chance of success, you have a high tolerance for risk.
If you take it a step further and invest six months salary, this shows that you have a very high risk tolerance.
