Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Insurance companies will only cover losses suffered while the policy is already in place.
Explanation:
Regardless of the type of insurance you purchase, the purpose of the coverage is having a policy in case an unexpected unfortunate event takes place. <em>Insurances do not enroll individuals who need the policy just because of an ongoing accident</em>. Those individuals could enroll in an insurance plan but the ongoing accident will not be covered by the company. Only those events happening when the policy is already valid are subject to evaluation for coverage.
Answer:
Explanation:
Yes, Disparate Impact Theory can be used in this case relating to the processes of subjective selection such as interrogations. If a discriminatory workplace practice has an unfair and aggressive impact on minorities, it may be in violation of Title VII. Professional individual employees who support on the basis of discretionary judgments without intending to do so are engaging in biased conduct.
The case of Watson V. Fort Worth Bank & Trust will be used to support my claim. Clara Watson turned down a promotion that was contingent on an interview under this scenario.
The U.s. Supreme Court Declared that a Title VII claim to a strategy of subjection enforcement can only be investigated under the unequal care principle. In the majority decision, the Court allowed the principle of (disparate effects) to apply to arbitrarily defined work practices.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": She is reviewing her goals and aligning the budget to work toward them.
Explanation:
Smart financial planning is the strategy by which individuals or corporations adjust their budgets according to the current situation they face. The adjustments are done as many times as necessary to accomplish the goals those individuals or firms have set.
In Christie's case, the reason why she adjusts her budget by the end of every month is that she needs to match her expenses with her objectives so she can reach them.
Options:
A. Subjective statement
B. Misrepresentation of a fact knowing that it is false.
C. Puffery
D. Seller's talk
Answer:B. Misrepresentation of a fact knowing that it is false.
Explanation:The misrepresentation of fact is a term used most often in the legal system to describe one of the steps or attitudes of people who are fraudulently inclined and want to go into contracts.
Misrepresentation of fact is an untrue statement or dishonest acts aimed at fraudulently inducing one or more persons to commit to a contract,this type of activity is abnormal and common to people who want to steal.
