Explanation:
a yellow curb is the answer to this question
Answer:
Forensic anthropologists analyze human remains, typically in criminal investigations. Their study of human remains aids in the detection of crime by working to assess the age, sex, stature, ancestry and unique features of a skeleton, which may include documenting trauma to the skeleton and its postmortem interval.
Explanation:
Answer:
Cell division is a process that makes our skin, tissues, muscles, sex cells etc. It is the building block of our body.
Explanation:
When parents cells ahs been divided into two or more than two daughter cells then it is called division of cells. The division of cells occur as a larger cell. When we talk about eukaryotic cells, these cells divided into two distinct types of the cells, the vegetative cells.
The daughter cells are the identical to the parents cells genetically. There are two types of division such as mitosis and meiosis. When parents cells divides in daughter cells and daughter cells divided further, this process called the cells cycle. The mitosis cell division occur interphase. Meiosis cell division occur in two phase meiosis I and meiosis II.
Only when a significant legal issue arises can a second appeal be made. Every appeal has a specific window of time in which it must be submitted.
<h3>Can you make a second appeal of the same ruling?</h3>
You can usually only appeal to the court that is directly above the trial court that made the decision in your case; whether you can appeal your case more than once depends on a variety of different criteria. However, the appeal may not always be heard by the appeals court.
<h3>What is the appeals ceiling?</h3>
There is a time limit for each appeal that it must be submitted within. The Limitation Act of 1963 includes such a restriction. The following limitation applies to appeals of civil judgments issued by subordinate courts: 90 days following the date of the decree are allowed for a High Court appeal.
To know more about appeal visit:
brainly.com/question/8643122
#SPJ4
Answer: It is a proper question
Explanation:
The witness is making a claim about what had transpired between the defendant and the plaintiff and in order for their testimony to stand, they need to have integrity such that a reasonable person can believe their testimony in this case.
In asking about the false claim that the witness had once filed, the defendant is trying to establish that the witness has no integrity and so in proving their untruthfulness, the defendant hopes to convince the court that the witness does not have enough integrity to be a witness.