Answer:
Option A an early lunch is your answer ☺️☺️
Under the condition that country X can manufacture cars more cheaply. An absolute advantage devours in a country if it makes good over alternative country and uses a smaller amount of wealth to yield that good. The result of a country’s natural legacy is the absolute advantage. Another example is extracting oil in Saudi Arabia is pretty much just a matter of drilling a hole. Generating oil in other countries can is essential substantial exploration and costly technologies for drilling and extraction if certainly they have any oil at all. The United States devours about the richest farmland in the world which manufacture it at ease to grow corn and wheat than in many other countries. Guatemala and Colombia partake environment particularly suitable for growing coffee. Chile and Zambia have about of the world’s richest copper mines. As some have claimed that geography is destiny. Chile will bargain copper and Guatemala will harvest coffee and they will trade. When each country has a product others necessity and it can be manufactured with fewer resources in one country over another then it is easy to visualize all parties do good from trade. Thinking about trade just in relations of geography and absolute advantage is incomplete. Trade actually happens because of comparative advantage.
I think its Sugar because that usually what people are talking about when dealing with children.
Answer:
A) a liability.
Explanation:
Probably, the strong culture held by the Young Woman's Club of Williams (YWCW) will be perceived to have a very low tolerance for diversity by the newcomers. It will also prevent the organization from growing in number. That doesn't mean that it will lose affiliates, but the total number of affiliates will not grow according to the growth in Williams's total population.
Since its strong culture will prevent the YWCW from growing and adapting to community changes, it should be considered a liability.
Answer:
B. Sue is entitled to Workers' Compensation even though her employer was not negligent.
Explanation:
Sue is performing her normal duties that is required by her being a secretary when she was injured. So the employer cannot be said to be negligent in allowing her carry paper for her unit.
She will not be able to sue for employer for her injuries.
However when an employee is injured they are entitled to Worker's compensation and paid time off work.
This is given to employees even when the employer is not negligent.
Sue can get the Worker's compensation for her back treatment.
