Answer:
Explanation:
United States is producing 200 tons of hamburgers and 60 tons of tacos.
United States' opportunity cost for producing 1 ton of hamburgers
= 
= 0.3
United States' opportunity cost for producing 60 tons of tacos.
= 
= 3.33
So we see that US has a lower opportunity cost in producing hamburgers, so it has a comparative advantage in producing hamburgers.
Mexico is producing 40 tons of hamburgers and 50 tons of tacos.
Mexico's opportunity cost of producing a ton of hamburgers
= 
= 1.25
Mexico's opportunity cost of producing a ton of tacos
= 
= 0.8
So we see that Mexico has a lower opportunity cost in producing tacos, so it has a comparative advantage in making tacos.
Since US specializes in making hamburgers, it will produce 200 tons of hamburgers and 0 tons of tacos.
Mexico specializes in making tacos, it will produce 50 tons of tacos and 0 tons of hamburgers.
Answer:
A Debit to manufacturing overhead for $9,000
Explanation:
Based on the information given in a situation where the Corporation recently used the amount of $9,000 of indirect materials during the production activities which means that The journal entries that will reflect these transactions would include a DEBIT to MANUFACTURING OVERHEAD of the amount of $9,000 which is the amount of indirect materials that was used during the production activities
A debit to manufacturing overhead for $9,000
Answer:
Option (B) is the right answer.
Explanation:
According to the investment company Act of 1940, the investment companies are those companies whose main business is to gathers investment capital to invest them in marketable securities.
Hence According to the scenario, the most appropriate answer is option (B).
While the other option is incorrect because of the following reason:
- Brokers/dealers can not be considered as an investment company because they are not the company.
- Pooled investments in metals are not an investment company but considered as the commodity pool.
- Insurance companies are also not investment companies.
Hi I think it might be the second option: <u>You can specialize in mechanics and still be able to feed your family without growing your own food.</u> I say this because the key word specialization used in the question and specialize.
Honestly taking a test with this same question at the moment and i am just taking a wild guess here. Im sorry if i got it wrong but good luck.
_________________________________
<h3>a) = 25% × $350,000 ÷ 100</h3><h3> = <u>$87,500</u></h3><h3 /><h3 /><h3>b) = $350,000 - $87,500</h3><h3> = <u>$262,500</u></h3>
_________________________________
