Answer: Face-to-face meetings
Explanation:
Face-to-face meetings are the gathering for formal discussion and communication between members of organization in in-person manner. It help in improvement of efficiency and proper making of decision instead of sending mails to each other.
According to the question,face-to-face meetings should be used by employee to know each other as in-person and develop communication and understand in with each other.They can then discuss about developing product.
Other options are incorrect because joint meeting are not the meeting mechanism which helps in knowing each other personally and increasing efficiency of work .Thus, the correct option is face-to-face meetings.
Answer:
The popular sovereignty refers to the principle that the governments rule and derive their power from the consent of the people that are governed. In other words that the governments are of the people for the people. This passage reflects that idea as it is the people of the United States that established the constitution.
Answer:
.(A) Small group is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Communicating with 3 to 12 other people united over time for a common purpose is the definition of Small group communication.
Small group communication is the interaction where three or more people have the same goal, and they are connected through mutual influence and with the common objective.
small group communication(characteristics)
- The small groups have about three or more members in the group, who share a similar purpose.
- This group is formed for a particular goal.
advantage of small group communication
- In small group communication information is easily distributed in a small group.
- Small group communication help to solve a specific problem.
Answer:
There are differing responses to this question, depending on which character provides the answer. Casca explains to Brutus and Cassius that, in the arena, Caesar refused the crown every time Antony offered it because each time he refused, the crowd responded uproariously. Casca observes that “he would fain have had it,” implying that Caesar’s refusal was, essentially, theater and that he was simply pandering to the crowd. On the other hand, Antony uses the same incident to reveal that Caesar refused the crown because he was not ambitious or power-hungry. However, it’s more likely that Caesar’s motivations were as Casca implies: Caesar theatrically refused the crown to further secure the hearts and minds of the people, and he fully intended to accept the crown when the senate officially offered it to him.
Explanation:
This is true because males are more likely to be aggressive in situations and don't think clearly when put into a situation compared to females.
