i believe the answer is c but don’t quote me on it
Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
Accurate measurement is VERY important in banking because banking is all about exact calculations. If one balance measure is off, the entire bank report will not be acurate. One little mess up and the entire calculation goes wrong.
